Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 182.12 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1973 c 732 s 27]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1959–1974 · leading case: Thill v. Modern Erecting Co., 136 N.W.2d 677 (Minn. 1965).
Thill v. Modern Erecting Co., 136 N.W.2d 677 (Minn. 1965). “Sec *230 ond, § 182.12 does not specify that only one particular party, the owner, must use due care.”
Whirlpool Corp. v. Morse, 222 F. Supp. 645 (D. Minn. 1963). “§ 182.12 provides: “Persons employed upon swinging scaffolds shall use a life line securely fastened to their persons and to some support other than the swinging scaffold.”
Cayse v. Foley Bros., Inc., 96 N.W.2d 238 (Minn. 1959). “So far as they are here material, those statutes provide: § 182.12. “When practicable, all scaffolds, hoists, cranes, stays, *179 supports, or other mechanical contrivances, erected or constructed by any person, firm, or corporation, in this state, for the use in erection,…”
Clark v. Rental Equip. Co., Inc., 220 N.W.2d 507 (Minn. 1974). “1971, § 182.12, this state adopted a standard for the protection of employees similar to the statutory standard in *425 effect in New York at the time of the Sarnoff decision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.