Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 2.17 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1957 [Repealed, Ex1959 c 45 s 70]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1984–2019 · leading case: Levine v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, 926 N.W.2d 49 (Minn. Ct. App. 2019).
Levine v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, 926 N.W.2d 49 (Minn. Ct. App. 2019). “2015) (stating that the doctrine of forum non conveniens allows a court to exercise its discretion to avoid the oppression or vexation that might result from automatically honoring a plaintiff's forum choice, but a dismissal on such basis also requires that there be an…”
Marriage of Moberg v. Moberg, 347 N.W.2d 791 (Minn. 1984). “749 (1933), IB Dunnell Minnesota Digest 2d Appeal and Error § 2.17(a) (3d Ed.1982).. The fact that the second order continued certain matters for hearing did not render that order non-appealable.”
Katzner v. Kelleher Constr., 535 N.W.2d 825 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). “Although the language in section 2.17 indicates that Kelleher and Spanerete agree to indemnify Ellerbe against claims based on Ellerbe’s own negligence, without an accompanying agreement to procure insurance against such claims, the agreement is unenforceable under Minn.”
Minn. Stat. § 2.17(a): 1 case
Marriage of Moberg v. Moberg, 347 N.W.2d 791 (Minn. 1984). “749 (1933), IB Dunnell Minnesota Digest 2d Appeal and Error § 2.17(a) (3d Ed.1982).. The fact that the second order continued certain matters for hearing did not render that order non-appealable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.