Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 200. GENERAL PROVISIONS; DEFINITIONS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 200.11 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1959 c 675 art 13 s 1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2011–2011 · leading case: Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 800 N.W.2d 663 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 800 N.W.2d 663 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “, Code of Ordinances (SPCO) § 200.11(b) (2010) (requiring the city to provide 14 days for dog owner to appeal potentially dangerous-dog determination or imposition of conditions).”
Minn. Stat. § 200.11(b): 1 case
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 800 N.W.2d 663 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). “, Code of Ordinances (SPCO) § 200.11(b) (2010) (requiring the city to provide 14 days for dog owner to appeal potentially dangerous-dog determination or imposition of conditions).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.