Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 215.11 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 6.48]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1951–2017 · leading case: Sierra Club v. Kimbell, 595 F. Supp. 2d 1021 (D. Minn. 2009).
Sierra Club v. Kimbell, 595 F. Supp. 2d 1021 (D. Minn. 2009). · cites it 2× “Section 215.11(a) provides that only parties who have submitted comments may file appeals with respect to site-specific actions.”
Otto v. Wright Cnty., 899 N.W.2d 186 (Minn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 215.11 (1971) (providing for audits of counties by public examiner); Minn.”
State v. Lowrie, 49 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. 1951). · cites it 6× “Section 215.11 provides: "* * * If any such examination shall disclose malfeasance, misfeasance, or non-feasance in any office of such county, such report shall be filed with the county attorney of the county, and it shall be his duty to institute such civil and criminal…”
State v. City of Little Falls, 74 N.W.2d 425 (Minn. 1956). “12 to § 215.11 for the sole purpose of correcting an obvious clerical error in statutory reference as it related to prosecutions for violations of law.”
Minn. Stat. § 215.11(a): 1 case
Sierra Club v. Kimbell, 595 F. Supp. 2d 1021 (D. Minn. 2009). “Section 215.11(a) provides that only parties who have submitted comments may file appeals with respect to site-specific actions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.