Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 23.02 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1949 c 278 s 1]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1951–2015 · leading case: Ackerson v. W. Union Tel. Co., 48 N.W.2d 338 (Minn. 1951).
Ackerson v. W. Union Tel. Co., 48 N.W.2d 338 (Minn. 1951). “Section 23.02 of article 23 of the contract provides, among other things, that where a major change in operating methods involves displacement of personnel the affected employe shall have the option of: “(a) Acceptance of pension, if eligible.”
RDNT, LLC v. City of Bloomington, 861 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. 2015). “Young, Anderson’s American Law of Zoning § 23.02 (4th ed.1996). Early state zoning enabling acts were generally enacted without corresponding planning legislation, and zoning regulations were carried out with no large-scale plan.”
Glen Lewy 1990 Trust v. Inv. Advisors, Inc., 650 N.W.2d 445 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). “§ 23.02(c). The district court applied Minn.”
Minn. Stat. § 23.02(c): 1 case
Glen Lewy 1990 Trust v. Inv. Advisors, Inc., 650 N.W.2d 445 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). “§ 23.02(c). The district court applied Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.