Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 253A.02 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1982 c 581 s 25]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1969–1988 · leading case: Johnson v. Noot, 323 N.W.2d 724 (Minn. 1982).
Johnson v. Noot, 323 N.W.2d 724 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 10× “The appeal panel found that Johnson suffered from an antisocial personality disorder and was dangerous, but ordered him discharged because he was not mentally ill as that term is defined in Minn.Stat. § 253A.02, subd. 3 (1980). 2 The Commissioner of Public Welfare obtained a…”
Dick v. Watonwan Cnty., 562 F. Supp. 1083 (D. Minnesota 1983). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 253A.02, subd. 4. Minn.Stat.”
Welsch v. Likins, 373 F. Supp. 487 (D. Minnesota 1974). · cites it 2× “§ 253A.02 subd. 5. A person found to be mentally deficient, upon commitment, comes under the care and custody of the Commissioner of Public Welfare.”
State v. Fearon, 166 N.W.2d 720 (Minn. 1969). · cites it 4× “” § 253A.02, subd. 4. Obviously, this includes the chronic alcoholic.”
Enebak v. Noot, 353 N.W.2d 544 (Minn. 1984). · cites it 2× “We held that a person with an antisocial personality disorder is not mentally ill under Minn.Stat. § 253A.02, subd. 3 (1980) (repealed 1982) unless he has lost the ability to control his actions.”
Lausche v. Comm'r of Pub. Welfare, 225 N.W.2d 366 (Minn. 1974). · cites it 2× “1971, § 253A.02, subd. 3, and Minn. St. 253A.02, subd.”
Dick v. Watonwan Cnty., 551 F. Supp. 983 (D. Minnesota 1982). · cites it 2× “5 Minn.Stat. § 253A.02, subd. 4 defined “inebriate person” as follows: “Inebriate person” means any person determined as being incapable of managing himself or his affairs by reason of the habitual and excessive use of intoxicating liquors, narcotics, or other drugs.”
Reome v. Levine, 350 N.W.2d 428 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 253A.02(17) (1980). The Minnesota Supreme Court in Johnson v.”
Reome v. Levine, 692 F. Supp. 1046 (D. Minnesota 1988). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 253A.02, subd. 3 (1980). Under the current Act, a mentally ill person means any person who has an organic disorder of the brain or a substantial psychiatric disorder of thought, mood, perception, orientation, or memory which grossly impairs judgment, behavior,…”
K. B. C. v. Cnty. of Itasca, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 253A.02(14) (1980). We need not decide whether petitioner is an interested person with standing to pursue a remedy under section 253A.”
In re El-Rashad, 411 N.W.2d 567 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “” *570 Minn.Stat. § 253A.02, subd. 3 (1980) (repealed 1982).”
Matter of KBC, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 253A.02(14) (1980). We need not decide whether petitioner is an interested person with standing to pursue a remedy under section 253A.”
— Minn. Stat. § 253A.02(14) — 2 cases
K. B. C. v. Cnty. of Itasca, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981). “See Minn.Stat. § 253A.02(14) (1980). We need not decide whether petitioner is an interested person with standing to pursue a remedy under section 253A.”
Matter of KBC, 308 N.W.2d 495 (Minn. 1981). “See Minn.Stat. § 253A.02(14) (1980). We need not decide whether petitioner is an interested person with standing to pursue a remedy under section 253A.”
— Minn. Stat. § 253A.02(17) — 1 case
Reome v. Levine, 350 N.W.2d 428 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “Minn.Stat. § 253A.02(17) (1980). The Minnesota Supreme Court in Johnson v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.