Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 257.251 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1980 c 589 s 38]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1978–1999 · leading case: State on Behalf of Forslund v. Bronson, 305 N.W.2d 748 (Minn. 1981).
State on Behalf of Forslund v. Bronson, 305 N.W.2d 748 (Minn. 1981). “*750 On August 6, 1979, the matter came on before the trial court on motion of plaintiff for an order directing defendant “to pay a fair and reasonable amount for the care and support of your minor child * * Defendant moved to dismiss the support proceedings on the ground that…”
Weber Ex Rel. Weber v. Anderson, 269 N.W.2d 892 (Minn. 1978). “Our paternity statute — see §§ 257.251 to 257.33 — similarly does not contain a specific provision for the survival of the action after the death of the putative father.”
Hepfel v. Bashaw, 279 N.W.2d 342 (Minn. 1979). “254 reads in part: “When requested to do so by a district or county court judge, public welfare or other , social service agency, the county attorney may appear on behalf of and represent the complainant in all proceedings under sections 257.251 to 257.259, 257.261 to 257.”
Benson v. LaBatte, 288 N.W.2d 684 (Minn. 1979). “In this paternity action brought pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 257.251 to 257.31 (1978) the trial court determined that defendant-appellant was the father of plaintiff’s child.”
Gramling v. Mem'l Blood Centers, 601 N.W.2d 457 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). “254 (1978) (“When requested to do so by a district court or county court judge, public welfare or other social service agency, the county attorney may appear on behalf of and represent the complainant in all proceedings under sections 257.251 to 257.259, 257.261 to 257.”
Larson v. Schmidt, 400 N.W.2d 131 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “In deciding whether a paternity action could be commenced after the death of the putative father to allow inheritance by the child born out of wedlock, the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled in favor of liberal construction of paternity statutes: [Although our paternity statute [§§…”
Steffes v. State, Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 309 N.W.2d 314 (Minn. 1981). “Such settlement shall discharge the alleged, acknowledged, or adjudicated father of all further liability, civil and criminal, on account of such child, provided that such settlement shall not affect his liability for the expenses of pregnancy, confinement, and mother’s…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.