Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 260. JUVENILE COURT; CHILD PLACEMENT; COMPACTS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 260.126 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1999 c 139 art 4 s 3]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases, 1995–2001 · leading case: In Re Welfare of D.M.D., 607 N.W.2d 432 (Minn. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Welfare of D.M.D., 607 N.W.2d 432 (Minn. 2000). · cites it 48× “On February 26, 1998, the prosecutor filed a motion seeking designation of the case as EJJ pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 260.126, subd. 2 (1998). As required by Minn.”
State v. Behl, 564 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. 1997). · cites it 14× “Minn.Stat. § 260.126, subd. 4(b) (1996). We find neither of these arguments particularly persuasive, however.”
In Re the Welfare of L.J.S., 539 N.W.2d 408 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 18× “576, § 14 (codified at Minn.Stat. § 260.126). A second amendment provides for presumptive certification for adult prosecution for certain offenses if the juvenile is sixteen or seventeen.”
State v. Mitchell, 577 N.W.2d 481 (Minn. 1998). · cites it 8× “Minn.Stat. § 260.126 (1994). Under EJJ, the juvenile court retains jurisdiction over a child until the age of 21.”
In Re the Welfare of C.L.S., 558 N.W.2d 12 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 23× “Citing the requirements of Minn.Stat. § 260.126, subd. 2 (1994), appellant C.”
In Re the Welfare of S.J.G., 547 N.W.2d 456 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 12× “The EJJ classification found in Minn.Stat. § 260.126 (1994) was explained in S.”
State v. Mohi, 901 P.2d 991 (Utah 1995). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 260.126 (1984). (4) New York, N.”
State v. Bradley, 592 N.W.2d 886 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 10× “Bradley was designated an extended jurisdiction juvenile under Minn.Stat. § 260.126, subd. 1(2) (1994). The court’s disposition stayed execution on his 150-month adult sentence and ordered Bradley to complete a program in a locked treatment facility.”
In Re the Welfare of J.K.B., 552 N.W.2d 732 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 8× “g a verbal exchange with the victim and culminated in appellant showing the victim a handgun, or holding a gun in the victim’s view, and allegedly stating, “Do you want to get shot in the head?” Because appellant was 16 and faced felony charges involving a firearm, the…”
In Re the Welfare of D.T.H., 572 N.W.2d 742 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 260.126, subds. 4(a)(2), 5 (1996).”
State v. Keeton, 589 N.W.2d 85 (Minn. 1998). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 260.126 (1996). 22 . Again, because we hold that the statements were improperly admitted under Minn.”
In re the Welfare of S.W.N., 541 N.W.2d 14 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 12× “The prosecutor also moved the district court to designate appellant’s delinquency proceeding an extended jurisdiction juvenile prosecution under Minn.Stat. § 260.126 (1994). After a hearing, the district court granted the motion, and this appeal followed.”
Show all 21 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.