Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 260.131 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1999 c 139 art 4 s 3]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1964–1995 · leading case: State v. Mohi, 901 P.2d 991 (Utah 1995).
State v. Mohi, 901 P.2d 991 (Utah 1995). · cites it 2× “(3) Minnesota, Minn.Stat. § 260.131(4) (1994). This statute gives prosecutors only the discretion to label a case "extended juvenile jurisdiction," which allows the court to consider both adult and juvenile penalties.”
In Re the Welfare of K.A.A., 410 N.W.2d 836 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 4× “[4] *839 The reference statute allows the reference of a juvenile to district court only after the following procedure has been followed: (a) A petition has been filed in accordance with the provisions of Minn.Stat. § 260.131; (b) Notice of the reference motion has been given in…”
State v. Parker, 244 N.W.2d 30 (Minn. 1976). · cites it 2× “The juvenile court may order a reference only if (a) A petition has been filed in accordance with the provisions of section 260.131 (b) Notice has been given in accordance with the provisions of sec *81 tions 260.”
In Re Welfare of IQS, 244 N.W.2d 30 (Minn. 1976). · cites it 2× “The juvenile court may order a reference only if (a) A petition has been filed in accordance with the provisions of section 260.131 (b) Notice has been given in accordance with the provisions of sections 260.”
In Re the Welfare of T. D. S., 289 N.W.2d 137 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 2× “The juvenile court may order a reference only if (a) A petition has been filed in accordance with the provisions of section 260.131 (b) Notice has been given in accordance with the provisions of sections 260.”
In Re the Welfare of K.S., 427 N.W.2d 653 (Minn. 1988). · cites it 2× “The procedures for the court’s review are set out in Minn.Stat. § 260.131 (1986), and such review must occur within 18 months of the placement.”
In Re the Welfare of J.S., 470 N.W.2d 697 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “⅜: * * * * * (c) In appointing a guardian ad litem pursuant to clause (a), the court shall not appoint the party * * * filing a petition pursuant to section 260.131. Although the statute precludes the appointment of a petitioner as guardian ad litem, it does not provide any…”
State v. Duncan, 250 N.W.2d 189 (Minn. 1977). · cites it 2× “The juvenile court may order a reference only if “(a) A petition has been filed in accordance with the provisions of section 260.131 “(b) Notice has been given in accordance with the provisions of sections 260.”
Welfare of J. E. C. v. State, 225 N.W.2d 245 (Minn. 1975). · cites it 2× “The juvenile court may order a reference only if (a) A petition has been filed in accordance with the provisions of section 260.131 (b) Notice has been given in accordance with the provisions of sections 260.”
In Re the Welfare of R.I., 402 N.W.2d 173 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “On October 5,1984, Cass County commenced a dependency action concerning all three children pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 260.131, alleging that the children were without proper parental care.”
Paternity of J.A v. v. Velasco, 536 N.W.2d 896 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “1 (1994) (any reputable person with knowledge of circumstances indicating rights of parent to child should be terminated may petition juvenile court in manner provided under Minn.Stat. § 260.131, subds. 2-3). The juvenile court has exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings…”
Turkel v. Ramsey Cnty. Welfare Bd., 127 N.W.2d 702 (Minn. 1964). “231 requires, by reference to § 260.131, that the petition shall plainly set forth “[t]he facts which bring the child within the jurisdiction of the court.”
— Minn. Stat. § 260.131(4) — 1 case
State v. Mohi, 901 P.2d 991 (Utah 1995). “(3) Minnesota, Minn.Stat. § 260.131(4) (1994). This statute gives prosecutors only the discretion to label a case "extended juvenile jurisdiction," which allows the court to consider both adult and juvenile penalties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.