§
Subdivision 1.Children who are delinquent.
Except as provided in sections 260B.125 and 260B.225, the juvenile court has original and exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings concerning any child who is alleged to be delinquent, a juvenile traffic offender, a juvenile petty offender, and in proceedings concerning any minor alleged to have been a delinquent, a juvenile petty offender, or a juvenile traffic offender prior to having become 18 years of age. The juvenile court shall deal with such a minor as it deals with any other child who is alleged to be delinquent or a juvenile traffic offender.
§
Subd. 2.No juvenile court jurisdiction over certain offenders.
Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the juvenile court lacks jurisdiction over proceedings concerning a child excluded from the definition of delinquent child under section 260B.007, subdivision 6, paragraph (b). The district court has original and exclusive jurisdiction in criminal proceedings concerning a child excluded from the definition of delinquent child under section 260B.007, subdivision 6, paragraph (b).
§
Subd. 3.Jurisdiction over parents and guardians.
A parent, guardian, or custodian of a child who is subject to the jurisdiction of the court is also subject to the jurisdiction of the court in any matter in which that parent, guardian, or custodian has a right to notice under section 260B.151 or 260B.152, or the right to participate under section 260B.163.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
16
cases (
4 in the last 5 years), 2001–2025 · leading case:
State v. Vang, 847 N.W.2d 248 (Minn. 2014).
State v. Vang, 847 N.W.2d 248 (Minn. 2014).
· cites it 4× “See Minn.Stat. § 260B.101, subd. 1. . To convict appellant of attempted first-degree felony murder (drive-by shooting) of Kou Vang, the State was required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that: (1) appellant acted with intent to kill Kou; (2) appellant committed an act that…”
State v. Ali, 806 N.W.2d 45 (Minn. 2011).
· cites it 9× “The indictment alleges that Ali was born on January 1,1993, which would make him 17 years old on the date of the alleged offense and therefore automatically subject to trial in the district court under Minn.Stat. §§ 260B.101, subd. 2, and 260B.”
State v. Martin, 773 N.W.2d 89 (Minn. 2009).
· cites it 2× “NOTES [1] Minnesota Statutes § 260B.101, subd. 1 (2008) gives the juvenile court jurisdiction over "delinquent" children.”
Vang v. State, 788 N.W.2d 111 (Minn. 2010).
· cites it 4× “Minn. Stat. § 260B.101, subd. 1 (2008). Under the Juvenile Court Act, Minn.”
In Re the Welfare of N.J.S., 753 N.W.2d 704 (Minn. 2008).
· cites it 4× “Minn. Stat. § 260B.101, subd. 1 (2006). A juvenile court can certify a child 14 years of age or older for adult prosecution, Minn.”
State v. Grigsby, 818 N.W.2d 511 (Minn. 2012).
· cites it 3× “As a threshold matter, we note that pursuant to the juvenile delinquency jurisdiction statute, Minn. Stat. § 260B.101, subd. 1 (2010), the juvenile court had exclusive jurisdiction over Grigsby at the time of the adult certification hearing and therefore the State could not…”
State v. Collins, 655 N.W.2d 652 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 260B.101, subd. 1 (2000). Except where a juvenile court has certified a minor for adult prosecution, when a child is alleged to have committed murder in the first degree after becoming 16 years of age, or when a court has original jurisdiction of a child who has…”
In Re the Welfare of J.C.P., 716 N.W.2d 664 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 260B.101, subd. 1 (2004) (providing that “the juvenile court has original and exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings concerning any child who is alleged to be delinquent”); State v.”
In re the Welfare of A.S., 882 N.W.2d 633 (Minn. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “” See Minn.Stat. § 260B.101, subd. 1 (2014). Minnesota law expressly excludes “juvenile highway traffic offender” from the definition of “delinquent child.”
In Re the Welfare of B.N.S., 647 N.W.2d 40 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 260B.101, subd. 1 (2000). An EJJ prosecution is a blending of juvenile and adult criminal dispositions that extends jurisdiction over a' young person to age twénty-one and permits the court to impose both a juvenile disposition and a criminal sentence.”
In Re the Welfare of B.J.M., 636 N.W.2d 155 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 260B.101, subd. 1 (2000). Unless the person falls under a statutory exception, juvenile court jurisdiction terminates when the person becomes 19 years old.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. D. H. (Minn. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 260B.101, subd. 1 (2014). However, when a juvenile is 16 or 17 years old at the time of the alleged offense and the offense carries a presumptive prison sentence under the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines, it is “presumed” that the juvenile court will certify a case…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.