Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 260B.130 (2026)

Extended Jurisdiction Juvenile Prosecutions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Designation.

A proceeding involving a child alleged to have committed a felony offense is an extended jurisdiction juvenile prosecution if:

(1) the child was 14 to 17 years old at the time of the alleged offense, a certification hearing was held, and the court designated the proceeding an extended jurisdiction juvenile prosecution;

(2) the child was 16 or 17 years old at the time of the alleged offense; the child is alleged to have committed an offense for which the Sentencing Guidelines and applicable statutes presume a commitment to prison or to have committed any felony in which the child allegedly used a firearm; and the prosecutor designated in the delinquency petition that the proceeding is an extended jurisdiction juvenile prosecution; or

(3) the child was 14 to 17 years old at the time of the alleged offense, the prosecutor requested that the proceeding be designated an extended jurisdiction juvenile prosecution, a hearing was held on the issue of designation, and the court designated the proceeding an extended jurisdiction juvenile prosecution.

Subd. 2.Hearing on prosecutor's request.

When a prosecutor requests that a proceeding be designated an extended jurisdiction juvenile prosecution, the court shall hold a hearing under section 260B.163 to consider the request. The hearing must be held within 30 days of the filing of the request for designation, unless good cause is shown by the prosecution or the child as to why the hearing should not be held within this period in which case the hearing shall be held within 90 days of the filing of the request. If the prosecutor shows by clear and convincing evidence that designating the proceeding an extended jurisdiction juvenile prosecution serves public safety, the court shall grant the request for designation. In determining whether public safety is served, the court shall consider the factors specified in section 260B.125, subdivision 4. The court shall decide whether to designate the proceeding an extended jurisdiction juvenile prosecution within 15 days after the designation hearing is completed, unless additional time is needed, in which case the court may extend the period up to another 15 days.

Subd. 3.Proceedings.

A child who is the subject of an extended jurisdiction juvenile prosecution has the right to a trial by jury and to the effective assistance of counsel, as described in section 260B.163, subdivision 4.

Subd. 4.Disposition.

(a) If an extended jurisdiction juvenile prosecution results in a guilty plea or finding of guilt, the court shall:

(1) impose one or more juvenile dispositions under section 260B.198; and

(2) impose an adult criminal sentence, the execution of which shall be stayed on the condition that the offender not violate the provisions of the disposition order and not commit a new offense.

(b) If a child prosecuted as an extended jurisdiction juvenile after designation by the prosecutor in the delinquency petition is convicted of an offense after trial that is not an offense described in subdivision 1, clause (2), the court shall adjudicate the child delinquent and order a disposition under section 260B.198. If the extended jurisdiction juvenile proceeding results in a guilty plea for an offense not described in subdivision 1, clause (2), the court may impose a disposition under paragraph (a) if the child consents.

[See Note.]

Subd. 5.Execution of adult sentence.

(a) When it appears that a person convicted as an extended jurisdiction juvenile has violated the conditions of the stayed sentence, or is alleged to have committed a new offense, the court may, without notice, revoke the stay and probation and direct that the offender be taken into immediate custody. The court shall notify the offender in writing of the reasons alleged to exist for revocation of the stay of execution of the adult sentence. If the offender challenges the reasons, the court shall hold a summary hearing on the issue at which the offender is entitled to be heard and represented by counsel.

(b) If a person described in paragraph (a) is taken into custody, the person may be detained in a secure juvenile detention facility. If there is no secure juvenile detention facility or existing acceptable detention alternative available for juveniles within the county, the child may be detained up to 24 hours, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, or for up to six hours in a standard metropolitan statistical area, in a jail, lockup, or other facility used for the confinement of adults who have been charged with or convicted of a crime. In this instance, the person must be confined in quarters separate from any adult confined in the facility that allow for complete sight and sound separation for all activities during the period of the detention, and the adult facility must be approved for the detention of juveniles by the commissioner of corrections.

If the person is 18 years of age or older and is to be detained prior to the revocation hearing, the person may be detained in a local adult correctional facility without the need for sight and sound separation.

(c) After the hearing, if the court finds that reasons exist to revoke the stay of execution of sentence, the court shall treat the offender as an adult and order any of the adult sanctions authorized by section 609.14, subdivision 3, except that no credit shall be given for time served in juvenile facility custody prior to a summary hearing. If the offender was convicted of an offense described in subdivision 1, clause (2), and the court finds that reasons exist to revoke the stay, the court must order execution of the previously imposed sentence unless the court makes written findings regarding the mitigating factors that justify continuing the stay.

(d) Upon revocation, the offender's extended jurisdiction status is terminated and juvenile court jurisdiction is terminated. The ongoing jurisdiction for any adult sanction, other than commitment to the commissioner of corrections, is with the adult court.

[See Note.]

Subd. 6.Inapplicability to certain offenders.

This section does not apply to a child excluded from the definition of delinquent child under section 260B.007, subdivision 6, paragraph (b).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 32 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2021 · leading case: State v. Garcia, 683 N.W.2d 294 (Minn. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Garcia, 683 N.W.2d 294 (Minn. 2004). · cites it 22× “The court of appeals affirmed, holding that Minn.Stat. § 260B.130, subd. 5 (2002), as amended in 2000, precluded the district court from granting Garcia credit for time served at MCF-Red Wing.”

State v. Serena, 673 N.W.2d 182 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 50× “Appealing from the district court's denial of jail credit for time spent in a juvenile correctional facility prior to the execution of his adult sentence of imprisonment, appellant Jesus Serena argues that (1) Minn. Stat. § 260B.130, subd. 5 (2000), does not restrict all jail…”

In Re the Welfare of D.D.R., 713 N.W.2d 891 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 24× “this court held Minn.Stat. § 260B.130, subd 4(b) (2002) unconstitutional and therefore, a stayed adult sentence is warranted under Minn.”

State v. B.Y., 659 N.W.2d 763 (Minn. 2003). · cites it 42× “Appellant appealed to the Minnesota Court of Appeals arguing that the EJJ statute, Minn.Stat. § 260B.130, subd. 5 (2002), controls and does not require the execution of appellant’s stayed sentence.”

In Re the Welfare of T.C.J., 689 N.W.2d 787 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 14× “y Finally, TCJ challenges the district court’s decision to sentence him under the extended-juvenile-jurisdiction procedure in Minn.Stat. § 260B.130, subd. 4(a) (2002), which requires the imposition of a stayed adult criminal sentence in addition to a juvenile disposition under…”

In Re the Welfare of J.K., 641 N.W.2d 617 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 45× “Minn.Stat. § 260B.130 (2000) governs EJJ prosecutions.”

In Re Welfare of J.L.P., 709 N.W.2d 289 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 24× “On appeal from the sentence, appellant argues that the imposition and execution of both a juvenile disposition and an adult criminal sentence, as required by Minn.Stat. § 260B.130, subd. 4 (2004), constitutes double punishment for the same offense and, therefore, violates the…”

State v. McFee, 721 N.W.2d 607 (Minn. 2006). · cites it 4× “NOTES [1] McFee was also charged with sale of marijuana in the fifth degree in a separate incident from October 7, 2003, and a jury found him guilty of that offense.”

In Re the Welfare of B.N.S., 647 N.W.2d 40 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 14× “See Minn.Stat. § 260B.130, subd. 4 (2000). Execution of the adult sentence is stayed so long as the offender does not violate the provisions of the juvenile disposition and does hot commit a new offense.”

State v. Garcia, 670 N.W.2d 297 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 7× “The district court granted jail credit for time spent in custody from and after 7 September 2002, when he was arrested, but denied credit for time appellant served at MCF-Red Wing; the court found that EJJ statutory provisions disallow credit for earlier confinements within the…”

In Re the Welfare of M.E.M., 674 N.W.2d 208 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “See also Minn.Stat. § 260B.130, subd. 3 (2002). The right to a jury trial is fundamental and must be personally waived by the defendant.”

State v. Grigsby, 818 N.W.2d 511 (Minn. 2012). · cites it 2× “The EJJ statute, Minn.Stat. § 260B.130, subd. 4(b) (2010), provides that “[i]f a child prosecuted as an extended jurisdiction juvenile .”

Show all 32 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.