§Subdivision 1.Persons entitled to appeal; procedure.
An appeal may be taken by the aggrieved person from a final order of the juvenile court affecting a substantial right of the aggrieved person, including but not limited to an order adjudging a child to be in need of protection or services, neglected and in foster care. The appeal shall be taken within 30 days of the filing of the appealable order. The court administrator shall notify the person having legal custody of the minor of the appeal. Failure to notify the person having legal custody of the minor shall not affect the jurisdiction of the appellate court. The order of the juvenile court shall stand, pending the determination of the appeal, but the reviewing court may in its discretion and upon application stay the order.
§Subd. 2.Appeal.
The appeal from a juvenile court is taken to the court of appeals as in civil cases, except as provided in subdivision 1.
Notes of Decisions
In re the Welfare of the Child. of L.L.P., 836 N.W.2d 563 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 10× “1 Allowing appellants to appeal the order denying their motion for adoptive placement is consistent with Minn.Stat. § 260C.415, subd. 1 (2012), which allows appeals of final orders affecting a substantial right of aggrieved persons.”
In Re the Welfare of J.R., 655 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2003).
· cites it 4× “Instead, the court relied on a statute, Minnesota Statutes section 260C.415 (2000), which provides that appeals from final orders in juvenile-protection matters must be taken within 30 days of the filing *3 of the appealable order and that an appeal from juvenile court is taken…”
In re the Welfare of the Child of T.L.M., 804 N.W.2d 374 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 8× “’s statement of the case asserts that the appeal was served and filed within the 30-day period of Minn.Stat. § 260C.415, subd. 1 (2010). This court questioned whether the appeal is timely in light of the 20-day appeal period prescribed by Minn.”
In Re the Welfare of J.B., 623 N.W.2d 640 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 4× “” Minn.Stat. § 260C.415, subd. 1 (2000). This court lacks jurisdiction to consider an untimely appeal from a final order in termination proceedings, and must dismiss.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.