Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 270.19 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2004 [Repealed, 2005 c 151 art 1 s 117]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1944–1969 · leading case: Vill. of Aurora v. Comm'r of Taxation, 14 N.W.2d 292 (Minn. 1944).
Vill. of Aurora v. Comm'r of Taxation, 14 N.W.2d 292 (Minn. 1944). “Taxpayers base their argument upon the provisions of § 270.19 (§ 2372-1). This section, which is the same as § 1 of L.”
Leskinen v. Pucelj, 115 N.W.2d 346 (Minn. 1962). “Paul, also proper town functions under § 270.19. The claims showed only the names of the payees, the claim numbers, the amounts, and a cryptic statement such as “necessary expenses” for meals, lodging, transportation while attending the various meetings, with the appropriate…”
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 99 v. Comm'r of Taxation, 165 N.W.2d 250 (Minn. 1969). “11, Subdivision 6,” and he scheduled a hearing “for the consideration of the petition under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 270.19.” Third, a hearing was thereafter held before the commissioner of taxation, 6 who expressly stated the hearing was held to consider…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.