Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 281. REAL ESTATE TAX SALES, REDEMPTION
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 281.18 (2026)

Lands May Be Redeemed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Every parcel of land heretofore sold to the state at any tax judgment sale and now subject to redemption shall continue subject to redemption until the expiration of the time allowed for redemption after the giving of notice of expiration as provided by law. Upon the expiration of such time absolute title to such parcel, if not theretofore redeemed, shall vest in the state.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1986–2023 · leading case: Tyler v. Hennepin Cnty., 598 U.S. 631 (2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tyler v. Hennepin Cnty., 598 U.S. 631 (2023). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. §§ 281.18 , 282.07, 282.08. Tyler fled suit, alleging that the County had unconstitutionally retained the excess value of her home above her tax debt in violation of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment.”
Geraldine Tyler v. State of Minnesota, 26 F.4th 789 (8th Cir. 2022). “Minn. Stat. § 281.18 . Even then, Tyler had six more months to apply to repurchase the condominium.”
Tyler v. Hennepin Cnty., 598 U.S. 631 (2023). “Minn. Stat. §§281.18 , 282.07, 282.08. Tyler filed suit, alleging that the County had unconstitutionally retained the excess value of her home above her tax debt in violation of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amend- ment.”
Peterson v. Humphrey, 381 N.W.2d 472 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “See Minn.Stat. § 281.18; § 284.07 (1976). Peterson brought no action to recover title or damages within the limitations period prescribed in Minn.”
Tyler v. Hennepin Cnty., 598 U.S. 631 (2023). “Minn. Stat. §§281.18 , 282.07, 282.08. Tyler filed suit, alleging that the County had unconstitutionally retained the excess value of her home above her tax debt in violation of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amend- ment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.