Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 3. LEGISLATURE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 3.07 (2026)

Additional Employees

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Each house, after its organization, may appoint and at pleasure remove the employees provided for by its permanent rules or recommended by its Committee on Rules. All officers and employees shall receive the compensation provided by the permanent rules of the electing or appointing body or recommended by its Committee on Rules. Unless otherwise expressly provided by law, no officer or employee shall receive any other compensation for services.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1976–1995 · leading case: Schumann v. McGinn, 240 N.W.2d 525 (Minn. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Schumann v. McGinn, 240 N.W.2d 525 (Minn. 1976). · cites it 12× “8 (1958), Comments on § 3.07, p. 60. This court is not in a position to resolve the conflicting ideologies represented in the two passages quoted above.”
Gruenke v. Miles, Inc., Welfare Plan, 872 F. Supp. 652 (D. Minn. 1995). · cites it 2× “Section 3.07 of the 1992 plan states that two weeks notice or pay in lieu of notice must be given to “[a]n employee whose employment is about to be terminated in a manner which would cause the employee to receive a severance benefit under this plan[.”
Schumann Ex Rel. Peterson v. City of St. Paul, 268 N.W.2d 903 (Minn. 1978). · cites it 2× “Model Penal Code (Approved Draft, 1962) § 3.07(2)(b), which provides: "The use of deadly force is not justifiable under this Section unless: "(i) the arrest is for a felony; and "(ii) the person effecting the arrest is authorized to act as a peace officer or is assisting a…”
Minn. Stat. § 3.07(2): 1 case
Schumann v. McGinn, 240 N.W.2d 525 (Minn. 1976). “8 (1958), Comments on § 3.07, p. 60. This court is not in a position to resolve the conflicting ideologies represented in the two passages quoted above.”
Minn. Stat. § 3.07(2)(b): 2 cases
Schumann v. McGinn, 240 N.W.2d 525 (Minn. 1976). “8 (1958), Comments on § 3.07, p. 60. This court is not in a position to resolve the conflicting ideologies represented in the two passages quoted above.”
Schumann Ex Rel. Peterson v. City of St. Paul, 268 N.W.2d 903 (Minn. 1978). “Model Penal Code (Approved Draft, 1962) § 3.07(2)(b), which provides: "The use of deadly force is not justifiable under this Section unless: "(i) the arrest is for a felony; and "(ii) the person effecting the arrest is authorized to act as a peace officer or is assisting a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.