Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 3. LEGISLATURE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 3.12 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1961 c 561 s 17]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1983–2024 · leading case: State v. Hough, 585 N.W.2d 393 (Minn. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Hough, 585 N.W.2d 393 (Minn. 1998). “LaFave and Scott, 1 Substantive Criminal Law, § 3.12(d) (1986). Transferred intent has been applied in numerous Minnesota cases.”
State v. Hough, 571 N.W.2d 578 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 3.12(d), at 400 (West 1986). LaFave and Scott refer to this as the "bad aim" problem.”
Pentair, Inc. v. Wisconsin Energy Corp., 545 F. Supp. 2d 917 (D. Minnesota 2008). “See Agreement § 3.12 (stating that schedule 3.12 sets forth a list of all insurance policies, including worker’s compensation insurance).”
Morrison v. Entrust Corp. (D. Minnesota 2024). “Rubenstein, Newberg on Class Actions § 3.12 (5th ed. 2017 Update). Here, there are 4,172 potential class members.”
Feldman v. Star Tribune Media Co. LLC (D. Minnesota 2024). “Rubenstein, Newberg on Class Actions § 3.12 (5th ed. 2017 Update)). As of the date of Mr.”
State of Minnesota v. Jyron Mendale Young (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). “Judges Ass’n, Minnesota Practice – Jury Instruction Guides § 3.12, at 44 (5th ed. 2006). Our review of the record reveals that the district court’s preliminary instruction adequately apprised the jury of potential issues concerning eyewitness identification.”
United States v. Agosto, 557 F. Supp. 454 (D. Minnesota 1983). “” Magistrate’s Manual, supra, § 3.12, at 3-19 (emphasis added); see 1968 House Report, supra, at 4263-65; Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Reports of the Proceedings of the Judicial Conference of the United States at 54 (1971).”
— Minn. Stat. § 3.12(d) — 2 cases
State v. Hough, 585 N.W.2d 393 (Minn. 1998). “LaFave and Scott, 1 Substantive Criminal Law, § 3.12(d) (1986). Transferred intent has been applied in numerous Minnesota cases.”
State v. Hough, 571 N.W.2d 578 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). “Scott, Substantive Criminal Law, § 3.12(d), at 400 (West 1986). LaFave and Scott refer to this as the "bad aim" problem.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.