No person may, with respect to an animal, carcass, part of a carcass, poultry, poultry food product, meat, or meat food product:
(1) slaughter an animal or prepare an article that is usable as human food, at any establishment preparing articles solely for intrastate commerce, except in compliance with this chapter;
(2) sell, transport, offer for sale or transportation, or receive for transportation, in intrastate commerce (i) articles which are usable as human food and are adulterated or misbranded at the time of sale, transportation, offer for sale or transportation, or receipt for transportation; or (ii) articles required to be inspected under sections 31A.01 to 31A.16 that have not been inspected and passed;
(3) do something to an article that is usable as human food while the article is being transported in intrastate commerce or held for sale after transportation, which is intended to cause or has the effect of causing the article to be adulterated or misbranded; or
(4) sell, offer for sale, or possess with intent to sell meat derived from custom processing, except wild game and fowl products may be donated under sections 17.035; 97A.505, subdivision 5; 97A.510; and 97B.303.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 2004–2005 · leading case:
State v. Hartmann, 700 N.W.2d 449 (Minn. 2005).
State v. Hartmann, 700 N.W.2d 449 (Minn. 2005).
· cites it 44× “04 (2004) and unauthorized sale of custom-processed meat under Minn.Stat. § 31A.10(4) (2004). [1] Before the district court and the court of appeals, the Hartmanns argued that their conduct was statutorily exempt from prosecution and also protected by Article XIII, Section 7, of…”
State v. Hartmann, 681 N.W.2d 690 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 7× “Appellants were convicted of violating Minn.Stat. § 31A.10, subd. 4 (2000), which forbids any person to “sell, offer for sale, or possess with intent to sell meat derived from custom processing.”
Minn. Stat. § 31A.10(4): 2 cases
State v. Hartmann, 700 N.W.2d 449 (Minn. 2005).
“04 (2004) and unauthorized sale of custom-processed meat under Minn.Stat. § 31A.10(4) (2004). [1] Before the district court and the court of appeals, the Hartmanns argued that their conduct was statutorily exempt from prosecution and also protected by Article XIII, Section 7, of…”
State v. Hartmann, 681 N.W.2d 690 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004).
“Appellants were convicted of violating Minn.Stat. § 31A.10, subd. 4 (2000), which forbids any person to “sell, offer for sale, or possess with intent to sell meat derived from custom processing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.