Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 325B. BEER BREWERS AND WHOLESALERS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 325B.14 (2026)

Obligations Of Successor

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A successor shall become obligated to all of the terms and conditions of the agreement in effect on the date of succession. This section applies regardless of the character or form of the succession. A successor has the right to contractually require its wholesalers to comply with operational standards of performance, if the standards are uniformly established for all of the successor's wholesalers and conform to sections 325B.01 to 325B.17.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1997–2000 · leading case: Guinness Imp. Co. v. Mark VII Distributors, Inc., 971 F. Supp. 401 (D. Minn. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Guinness Imp. Co. v. Mark VII Distributors, Inc., 971 F. Supp. 401 (D. Minn. 1997). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 325B.14. Mark VII argues that by Guinness’ payment of $600,000 to D&G for importation rights and by D&G’s payment of $600,000 to Labatt pursuant to the terms of the importation agreement, Guinness “purchased” importation rights such that it is obligated under the…”
Guinness Imp. Co. v. Mark Vii Distributors, Inc., Third-Party v. Desnoes & Geddes, Ltd., Third-Party, 153 F.3d 607 (3d Cir. 1998). “Minn.Stat. Ann. § 325B.14. The terms “brewer” and “purchase” are unambiguous.”
Arneson Distrib. Co. v. Miller Brewing Co., 117 F. Supp. 2d 905 (D. Minn. 2000). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 325B.14. Miller asserts that the Plaintiffs’ existing agreements permit Miller to amend or terminate the agreements, so *909 long as the amendment or termination is made uniformly, pursuant to the provisions of the Stroh and Pabst agreements cited previously.”
Guinness Imp. Co. v. Mark VII (8th Cir. 1998). “Minn. Stat. Ann. § 325B.14. The terms “brewer” and “purchase” are unambiguous.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.