Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 325G. CONSUMER PROTECTION; SOLICITATION OF SALES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 325G.19 (2026)

Express Warranties

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Disclaimers.

No express warranty arising out of a consumer sale of new goods shall disclaim implied warranties of merchantability, or, where applicable, of fitness.

Subd. 2.Honoring of express warranties.

The maker of an express warranty arising out of a consumer sale in this state shall honor the terms of the express warranty. In a consumer sale, the manufacturer shall honor an express warranty made by the manufacturer; the distributor shall honor an express warranty made by the distributor; and the retail seller shall honor an express warranty made by the retail seller.

Subd. 3.Liability of manufacturer to retailer.

Every manufacturer who makes an express warranty pursuant to a consumer sale, who authorizes a retail seller within this state to perform services or repairs under the terms of the express warranty shall be liable to the retail seller in an amount equal to that which is charged by the retail seller for like service or repairs rendered to retail consumers who are not entitled to warranty protection.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1986–2009 · leading case: Adt Sec. Servs., Inc. v. Swenson, 687 F. Supp. 2d 884 (D. Minn. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Adt Sec. Servs., Inc. v. Swenson, 687 F. Supp. 2d 884 (D. Minn. 2009). · cites it 2× “13; and (11) breach of express limited warranty, for ADT’s violations of the express written warranty provided to Lee in the security system’s purchase agreement, see Minn.Stat. § 325G.19. The trustee and children each allege claims for (1) negligence and negligence per se; (2)…”
Metag v. K-Mart Corp., 385 N.W.2d 864 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Appellant claims that respondent’s admission of liability based on allegations in the complaint, which included a count alleging breach of express warranties, constitutes a violation of the consumer warranties act, Minn.Stat. § 325G.19 (1984). A violation of the consumer…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.