Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 326.243 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2006 [Renumbered 326B.35]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1981–2008 · leading case: City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., 749 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2008).
City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., 749 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2008). “0200 (2005) (providing that "[a]ll new electrical wiring, apparatus, and equipment for electric light, heat, power, technology circuits and systems, and alarm and communication systems must comply with" the 2002 edition of the National Electrical Code, as approved by the…”
Conover v. N. States Power Co., 313 N.W.2d 397 (Minn. 1981). “" Under Minn.Stat. § 326.243 (1980), this portion of the Code is prima facie evidence of accepted safety standards.”
Hellman v. Julius Kolesar, Inc., 399 N.W.2d 654 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “The record shows, and the parties agree, that NSP fully complied with Minn.Stat. § 326.243 and the Code by placing the utility pole 12 inches from the street.”
Steinbrecher v. McLeod Coop. Power Ass'n, 392 N.W.2d 709 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Was it error to limit the recovery to an amount corresponding to the negligence attributed to the McLeod Cooperative Power Association? ANALYSIS Appellants argue that compliance with Minn.Stat. § 326.243 entitles them to judgment as a matter of law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.