The liability of the vendor or the home improvement contractor under sections 327A.01 to 327A.07 is limited to the specific items set forth in sections 327A.01 to 327A.07 and does not extend to the following:
(a) loss or damage not reported by the vendee or the owner to the vendor or the home improvement contractor in writing within six months after the vendee or the owner discovers or should have discovered the loss or damage; unless the vendee or owner establishes that the vendor or home improvement contractor had actual notice of the loss or damage;
(b) loss or damage caused by defects in design, installation, or materials which the vendee or the owner supplied, installed, or directed to be installed;
(c) secondary loss or damage such as personal injury or property damage;
(d) loss or damage from normal wear and tear;
(e) loss or damage from normal shrinkage caused by drying of the dwelling or the home improvement within tolerances of building standards;
(f) loss or damage from dampness and condensation due to insufficient ventilation after occupancy;
(g) loss or damage from negligence, improper maintenance or alteration of the dwelling or the home improvement by parties other than the vendor or the home improvement contractor;
(h) loss or damage from changes in grading of the ground around the dwelling or the home improvement by parties other than the vendor or the home improvement contractor;
(i) landscaping or insect loss or damage;
(j) loss or damage from failure to maintain the dwelling or the home improvement in good repair;
(k) loss or damage which the vendee or the owner, whenever feasible, has not taken timely action to minimize;
(l) loss or damage which occurs after the dwelling or the home improvement is no longer used primarily as a residence;
(m) accidental loss or damage usually described as acts of God, including, but not limited to: fire, explosion, smoke, water escape, windstorm, hail or lightning, falling trees, aircraft and vehicles, flood, and earthquake, except when the loss or damage is caused by failure to comply with building standards;
(n) loss or damage from soil movement which is compensated by legislation or covered by insurance;
(o) loss or damage due to soil conditions where construction is done upon lands owned by the vendee or the owner and obtained by the vendee or owner from a source independent of the vendor or the home improvement contractor;
(p) in the case of home improvement work, loss or damage due to defects in the existing structure and systems not caused by the home improvement.
Notes of Decisions
Vlahos v. R&I Constr. of Bloomington, Inc., 676 N.W.2d 672 (Minn. 2004).
· cites it 14× “We hold that it does, subject to the specifically enumerated exclusions and exceptions provided in Minn.Stat. § 327A.03 (2002). Concluding that the homeowner’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations and failed to allege major construction defects, the district court…”
Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc., 636 N.W.2d 352 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001).
· cites it 13× “Minn.Stat. § 327A.03 provides, in relevant part: The liability of the vendor or the home improvement contractor under sections 327A.”
650 North Main Ass'n v. Frauenshuh, Inc. (Territorial Springs Riverview, LLC, Frauenshuh Sweeney, LLC), Kraus-Anderson Constr. Co., Doe Affiliates 1-20, & Kraus-Anderson Constr. Co., & Third Party v. Berwald Roofing Co., Inc., Third Party, 885 N.W.2d 478 (Minn. Ct. App. 2016).
· cites it 4× “See Minn.Stat. § 327A.03(a) (2014). However, the district court granted the motion with regard to the architectural design defects found by the jury, concluding that Frauenshuh was responsible for the architectural design defects and was liable to the association for the…”
Gomez v. David A. Williams Realty & Constr., Inc., 740 N.W.2d 775 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 6× “The builder and the window manufacturer moved for summary judgment on the homeowners’ claims based in part on lack of notice required by Minn.Stat. § 327A.03(a) (2004), and the two-year statute of limitations, contained in Minn.”
Ocel v. City of Eagan, 402 N.W.2d 531 (Minn. 1987).
· cites it 2× “" Minn.Stat. § 327A.03 then provides that the liability of the vendor or home improvement contractor does not extend to a loss not reported by the vendee or owner to the vendor or home improvement contractor in writing within 6 months after the loss is or should have been…”
Miller v. Lankow, 776 N.W.2d 731 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009).
· cites it 2× “1 (2008) (setting forth two-year statute of limitations for tort claims arising out of construction defects); see also Minn.Stat. § 327A.03 (2008) (stating that statutory warranties for home improvements apply only when the party providing a home improvement is given notice of a…”
Peterson v. Johnson, 733 N.W.2d 502 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 26× “Upon certification by the district court, appellant Philip Johnson challenges the district court’s denial of summary judgment in a home-warranty dispute, arguing that respondent Lisa Peterson failed to provide proper written notice under Minn. Stat. § 327A.03(a) (2006) and that…”
— Minn. Stat. § 327A.03(a) — 5 cases
Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc., 636 N.W.2d 352 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001).
“Minn.Stat. § 327A.03 provides, in relevant part: The liability of the vendor or the home improvement contractor under sections 327A.”
Vlahos v. R&I Constr. of Bloomington, Inc., 676 N.W.2d 672 (Minn. 2004).
“We hold that it does, subject to the specifically enumerated exclusions and exceptions provided in Minn.Stat. § 327A.03 (2002). Concluding that the homeowner’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations and failed to allege major construction defects, the district court…”
650 North Main Ass'n v. Frauenshuh, Inc. (Territorial Springs Riverview, LLC, Frauenshuh Sweeney, LLC), Kraus-Anderson Constr. Co., Doe Affiliates 1-20, & Kraus-Anderson Constr. Co., & Third Party v. Berwald Roofing Co., Inc., Third Party, 885 N.W.2d 478 (Minn. Ct. App. 2016).
“See Minn.Stat. § 327A.03(a) (2014). However, the district court granted the motion with regard to the architectural design defects found by the jury, concluding that Frauenshuh was responsible for the architectural design defects and was liable to the association for the…”
Gomez v. David A. Williams Realty & Constr., Inc., 740 N.W.2d 775 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007).
“The builder and the window manufacturer moved for summary judgment on the homeowners’ claims based in part on lack of notice required by Minn.Stat. § 327A.03(a) (2004), and the two-year statute of limitations, contained in Minn.”
Peterson v. Johnson, 733 N.W.2d 502 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007).
“Upon certification by the district court, appellant Philip Johnson challenges the district court’s denial of summary judgment in a home-warranty dispute, arguing that respondent Lisa Peterson failed to provide proper written notice under Minn. Stat. § 327A.03(a) (2006) and that…”
— Minn. Stat. § 327A.03(g) — 1 case
Vlahos v. R&I Constr. of Bloomington, Inc., 676 N.W.2d 672 (Minn. 2004).
“We hold that it does, subject to the specifically enumerated exclusions and exceptions provided in Minn.Stat. § 327A.03 (2002). Concluding that the homeowner’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations and failed to allege major construction defects, the district court…”
— Minn. Stat. § 327A.03(h) — 1 case
Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc., 636 N.W.2d 352 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001).
“Minn.Stat. § 327A.03 provides, in relevant part: The liability of the vendor or the home improvement contractor under sections 327A.”
— Minn. Stat. § 327A.03(k) — 1 case
Vlahos v. R&I Constr. of Bloomington, Inc., 676 N.W.2d 672 (Minn. 2004).
“We hold that it does, subject to the specifically enumerated exclusions and exceptions provided in Minn.Stat. § 327A.03 (2002). Concluding that the homeowner’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations and failed to allege major construction defects, the district court…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.