Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 340. INTOXICATING LIQUORS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 340.114 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1985 c 305 art 13 s 1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1975–1984 · leading case: Fed. Distillers, Inc. v. State, 229 N.W.2d 144 (Minn. 1975).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Fed. Distillers, Inc. v. State, 229 N.W.2d 144 (Minn. 1975). · cites it 2× “Section 340.114).” Dept, of Administration, Rules and Regs, of the Dept, of Liquor Control, 1970 ed.”
Johnson Bros. Wholesale Liquor Co. v. Novak, 295 N.W.2d 238 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 2× “The commissioner shall hereinafter establish a register for such brand labels, which labels shall be acceptable under the following conditions: (1) No brand of intoxicating liquor as here-inbefore described shall be manufactured or imported for sale within the state after the…”
Intercontinental Packaging Co. v. Novak, 348 N.W.2d 330 (Minn. 1984). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 340.114, subd. 3 (1982); 11 MCAR § 1.”
Dakota Wholesale Liquor, Inc. v. Minnesota, 584 F.2d 847 (8th Cir. 1978). “The venture was dependent upon receiving a Minnesota wholesalers license because Minnesota, unlike South Dakota, has a statute, Minn.Stat. Ann. § 340.114, which provides in part that “All licensed importers shall offer for sale on an equal basis to all licensed wholesalers and…”
Ed. Phillips & Sons Co. v. Novak, 422 U.S. 1003 (1975). “664, § 2 ( Minn. Stat. § 340.114 (1974)), presented to Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.