Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 363.031 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 363A.31]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1990–2009 · leading case: Johnson v. Piper Jaffray, Inc., 530 N.W.2d 790 (Minn. 1995).
Johnson v. Piper Jaffray, Inc., 530 N.W.2d 790 (Minn. 1995). “Johnson further maintains that she should not be compelled to arbitrate her claims against Piper Jaffray because of alleged procedural deficiencies existing in the arbitration process. Johnson finally argues that her agreement to arbi *794 trate her discrimination claims brought…”
Chappell v. Butterfield-odin Sch. Dist. No. 836, 673 F. Supp. 2d 818 (D. Minnesota 2009). “The Release also stated that Chappell had been informed of her right under Minn.Stat. § 363.031 to rescind the Release within fifteen days of signing it.”
Correll v. Distinctive Dental Servs., P.A., 607 N.W.2d 440 (Minn. 2000). “We stated in dicta, however, that section 363.031 2 *445 of the human rights act “voids agreements that purport to waive the right to a judicial forum.”
Johnson v. Hubbard Broad., Inc., 940 F. Supp. 1447 (D. Minnesota 1996). “While the MHRA expressly prohibits the prospective waiver of statutory rights in this matter, see Minn.Stat. § 363.031 (1994), the Minnesota Supreme Court held in Johnson v.”
Spitzmueller v. Burlington N. R.R., 740 F. Supp. 671 (D. Minnesota 1990). “Any provision, whether oral or written, of a lease, contract, or other agreement or instrument, which purports to be a waiver by an individual of any right or remedy provided in this chapter is contrary to public policy and void if the waiver or release purports to waive claims…”
McClaine v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 16, 503 N.W.2d 810 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “In December 1991, January 1992, and February 1992, McClaine demanded that the District set aside the July 1991 agreement and reinstate her to a full-time position with back pay because the failure to inform her in writing of the right under Minn.Stat. § 363.031, subd. 2 (1990)…”
Barbara Burns v. AON Corp. (8th Cir. 1996). “Although the settlement agreement did not release FBH-MN from liability for claims arising after the agreement was signed, see Minn. Stat. Ann. § 363.031 (West 1991) (prohibiting prospective waiver), summary judgment was also proper as to Burns's reprisal claim under the MHRA,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.