Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 4.17 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 116J.45]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2025 · leading case: Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc., 810 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Minnesota 2011).
Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc., 810 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Minnesota 2011). “As discussed above, § 4.17 of Yang’s Franchise Agreement directly addressed replacement of accounts by Jani-King, and therefore conduct regarding account replacement cannot serve as the basis for quasi-contract claims here.”
State v. Kaiser, 469 N.W.2d 316 (Minn. 1991). “Bond, Plea Bargaining and Guilty Pleas § 4.17 (2 ed. 1983).”
In re the Est. of: Joanne Mary Ecklund, Decedent (Minn. 2025). “, Revision: HCFA-PM-95-3, TN 16-0007, State Plan Under Title XIX of the Social Security Act 53a § 4.17(b) (2016). By asserting compliance, DHS attested that section 256B.”
— Minn. Stat. § 4.17(2) — 1 case
Teng Moua v. Jani-King of Minnesota, Inc., 810 F. Supp. 2d 882 (D. Minnesota 2011). “As discussed above, § 4.17 of Yang’s Franchise Agreement directly addressed replacement of accounts by Jani-King, and therefore conduct regarding account replacement cannot serve as the basis for quasi-contract claims here.”
— Minn. Stat. § 4.17(b) — 1 case
In re the Est. of: Joanne Mary Ecklund, Decedent (Minn. 2025). “, Revision: HCFA-PM-95-3, TN 16-0007, State Plan Under Title XIX of the Social Security Act 53a § 4.17(b) (2016). By asserting compliance, DHS attested that section 256B.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.