Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 412. STATUTORY CITIES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 412.011 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1967 [Repealed, 1969 c 1146 s 20]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1951–1969 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Harrier v. Vill. of Spring Lake Park, 71 N.W.2d 812 (Minn. 1955).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Harrier v. Vill. of Spring Lake Park, 71 N.W.2d 812 (Minn. 1955). · cites it 4× “These proceedings were conducted in accordance with § 412.011. On January 16, 1954, the council of the village of Spring Lake Park acted upon a petition for the annexation of a certain portion of the township of Blaine to the village of Spring Lake Park, this being the disputed…”
Ellis v. Vill. of Bloomington, Inc., 72 N.W.2d 350 (Minn. 1955). · cites it 7× “Section 412.011, subd. 2, the census provisions of which had their origin in enactments existing long prior to § 340.”
Vill. of Farmington v. Minnesota Mun. Comm'n, 170 N.W.2d 197 (Minn. 1969). · cites it 2× “Shortly thereafter, the village council of Spring Lake Park, acting upon a petition, proceeded to annex a portion of the same land and gave the 10 days' notice of the annexation election required by Minn. St.1953, § 412.”
State Ex Rel. Vill. of Orono v. Vill. of Long Lake, 77 N.W.2d 46 (Minn. 1956). “(2) Whether under § 412.011 it is the filing of the petition for incorporation with the board of county commissioners, giving the county board jurisdiction over the incorporation proceedings, which determines priority and precludes subsequent proceedings for annexation of any…”
Dakota Cnty. Members of the Bar v. Dakota Cnty. Officials, 150 N.W.2d 863 (Minn. 1967). · cites it 2× “” The statute providing for an incorporation census antedated the statute governing establishment of municipal liquor dispensaries.”
State Ex Rel. Town of White Bear v. City of White Bear Lake, 95 N.W.2d 294 (Minn. 1959). “The new sections (now §§ 412.011, subd. 1, and 412.041) gave express recognition to the requirement that territory must be properly conditioned for annexation to a village.”
State Ex Rel. Twp. of Copley v. Vill. of Webb, 83 N.W.2d 788 (Minn. 1957). “755, 759, this court, in interpreting an earlier version of § 412.011, subd. 1, held that the statutory test of whether incorporated territory is so conditioned as properly to be subjected to village government embraces three basic essentials to a valid incorporation, namely,…”
State Ex Rel. N. Pump Co. v. Vill. of Fridley, 47 N.W.2d 204 (Minn. 1951). “The parties to this proceeding agree that such is the case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.