Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 480A.06 (2026)

Jurisdiction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Final decisions.

The court of appeals has jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the trial courts, other than the conciliation courts, of the state of Minnesota, except that it shall not have jurisdiction of appeals in legislative or statewide election contests or criminal appeals in cases in which the defendant has been convicted of murder in the first degree.

Subd. 2.Interlocutory decisions.

The court of appeals shall have jurisdiction of interlocutory appeals and other matters as may be prescribed in the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Subd. 3.Certiorari review.

The court of appeals shall have jurisdiction to issue writs of certiorari to all agencies, public corporations and public officials, except the Tax Court and the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals. The court of appeals shall have jurisdiction to review decisions of the commissioner of employment and economic development, pursuant to section 268.105.

Subd. 4.Administrative review.

The court of appeals shall have jurisdiction to review on the record the validity of administrative rules, as provided in sections 14.44 and 14.45, and the decisions of administrative agencies in contested cases, as provided in sections 14.63 to 14.69.

Subd. 5.Ancillary jurisdiction.

The court of appeals shall have jurisdiction to issue all writs and orders necessary in aid of its jurisdiction with respect to cases pending before it and for the enforcement of its judgments or orders.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1983–2025 · leading case: White Bear Rod & Gun Club v. City of Hugo, 388 N.W.2d 739 (Minn. 1986).
White Bear Rod & Gun Club v. City of Hugo, 388 N.W.2d 739 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 8× “It seems to us we have here, as in Ram, a narrow legal procedural question which lends itself to certiorari, namely: Did the Hugo City Council set out its decision in proper legal form for judicial review? But if certiorari lies, should it issue from the district court or the…”
State v. Ali, 806 N.W.2d 45 (Minn. 2011). · cites it 9× “Indeed, the court’s ad hoc approach is not only at odds with our most recent *56 decision on the collateral order doctrine, 1 it is unnecessary given the language of Minn. Stat. § 480A.06, subd. 1 (2010). Minnesota Statutes § 480A.”
Strand v. Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, 392 N.W.2d 881 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 6× “6, § 2 of the Minnesota Constitution confers upon the court of appeals appellate jurisdiction over all courts except the supreme court “and other appellate jurisdiction as prescribed by law,” Minn.Stat. § 480A.06, defining the scope of that court’s jurisdiction, contains no…”
State v. Warren, 592 N.W.2d 440 (Minn. 1999). · cites it 4× “35 Under Minn.Stat. § 480A.06 (1998), the court of appeals lacks jurisdiction over criminal appeals in cases in which the defendant has been convicted of murder in the first degree.”
Rickert v. State, 795 N.W.2d 236 (Minn. 2011). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. §§ 480A.06, subd. 1, 632.14 (2010).”
Bradley Tipka, Relator v. Lincoln Int'l Charter Sch., 864 N.W.2d 371 (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 8× “See Minn.Stat. § 480A.06 (2014). One basis is certiorari review.”
Neujahr v. Ramsey Cnty. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 370 N.W.2d 446 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 8× “165 (amending Minn.Stat. § 480A.06, subd. 3 (1984)), giving this court jurisdiction to issue writs of certiorari to "all agencies.”
Grp. Health Plan, Inc. v. Lopez, 341 N.W.2d 294 (Minn. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “This matter is before the Court of Appeals on a writ of certiorari from the Department of Economic Security authorized by Minn.Stat. §§ 480A.06(3) and 268.10(8) (1982).”
Heideman v. Metro. Airports Comm'n, 555 N.W.2d 322 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 4× “” Minn.Stat. § 480A.06, subd. 3 (1994). But section 480A.”
In Re Complaint Against the Sandy Pappas Senate Comm., 488 N.W.2d 795 (Minn. 1992). · cites it 2× “Doty sought judicial review of the Board’s determination by petitioning the court of appeals for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 480A.06, subd. 3 “upon the grounds that [the Board’s decision] is not in conformity with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 10A, and…”
Twp. of Honner v. Redwood Cnty., 518 N.W.2d 639 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “” Minn.Stat. § 480A.06, subd. 3 (1992). The district courts retain the power to issue writs of certiorari “necessary to the complete exercise of the jurisdiction vested in them by law.”
C.S. McCrossan Constr., Inc. v. Minnesota Dep't of Transp., 946 F. Supp. 2d 851 (D. Minnesota 2013). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 480A.06, subd. 3; Minn. R. Civ.”
— Minn. Stat. § 480A.06(3) — 1 case
Grp. Health Plan, Inc. v. Lopez, 341 N.W.2d 294 (Minn. Ct. App. 1983). “This matter is before the Court of Appeals on a writ of certiorari from the Department of Economic Security authorized by Minn.Stat. §§ 480A.06(3) and 268.10(8) (1982).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.