Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 503.15 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1969 [Temporary]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2011–2012 · leading case: Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 2012).
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 2012). “Under the City Code, [i]f an owner of an animal has subsequently violated the provisions under § 503.15 with the same animal, the ani *637 mal must be seized by animal control.”
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 800 N.W.2d 663 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). “Sawh a letter notifying her that, under Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances § 503.15, she was “allowed to request a hearing before the City Council to review the dangerous animal determination.”
Minn. Stat. § 503.15(1): 1 case
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 800 N.W.2d 663 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). “Sawh a letter notifying her that, under Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances § 503.15, she was “allowed to request a hearing before the City Council to review the dangerous animal determination.”
Minn. Stat. § 503.15(3)(a): 2 cases
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 2012). “Under the City Code, [i]f an owner of an animal has subsequently violated the provisions under § 503.15 with the same animal, the ani *637 mal must be seized by animal control.”
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 800 N.W.2d 663 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). “Sawh a letter notifying her that, under Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances § 503.15, she was “allowed to request a hearing before the City Council to review the dangerous animal determination.”
Minn. Stat. § 503.15(3)(a)(5): 1 case
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 2012). “Under the City Code, [i]f an owner of an animal has subsequently violated the provisions under § 503.15 with the same animal, the ani *637 mal must be seized by animal control.”
Minn. Stat. § 503.15(3)(b): 1 case
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 800 N.W.2d 663 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). “Sawh a letter notifying her that, under Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances § 503.15, she was “allowed to request a hearing before the City Council to review the dangerous animal determination.”
Minn. Stat. § 503.15(3)(d): 1 case
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 2012). “Under the City Code, [i]f an owner of an animal has subsequently violated the provisions under § 503.15 with the same animal, the ani *637 mal must be seized by animal control.”
Minn. Stat. § 503.15(4): 2 cases
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 2012). “Under the City Code, [i]f an owner of an animal has subsequently violated the provisions under § 503.15 with the same animal, the ani *637 mal must be seized by animal control.”
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 800 N.W.2d 663 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). “Sawh a letter notifying her that, under Lino Lakes Code of Ordinances § 503.15, she was “allowed to request a hearing before the City Council to review the dangerous animal determination.”
Minn. Stat. § 503.15(5): 1 case
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 2012). “Under the City Code, [i]f an owner of an animal has subsequently violated the provisions under § 503.15 with the same animal, the ani *637 mal must be seized by animal control.”
Minn. Stat. § 503.15(5)(b): 1 case
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 2012). “Under the City Code, [i]f an owner of an animal has subsequently violated the provisions under § 503.15 with the same animal, the ani *637 mal must be seized by animal control.”
Minn. Stat. § 503.15(6): 1 case
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 2012). “Under the City Code, [i]f an owner of an animal has subsequently violated the provisions under § 503.15 with the same animal, the ani *637 mal must be seized by animal control.”
Minn. Stat. § 503.15(7): 1 case
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 2012). “Under the City Code, [i]f an owner of an animal has subsequently violated the provisions under § 503.15 with the same animal, the ani *637 mal must be seized by animal control.”
Minn. Stat. § 503.15(7)(a): 1 case
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 2012). “Under the City Code, [i]f an owner of an animal has subsequently violated the provisions under § 503.15 with the same animal, the ani *637 mal must be seized by animal control.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.