Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 504B.215 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2022 [Repealed, 2024 c 107 s 9]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2009–2024 · leading case: Persigehl v. Ridgebrook Investments Ltd. P'ship, 858 N.W.2d 824 (Minn. Ct. App. 2015).
Persigehl v. Ridgebrook Investments Ltd. P'ship, 858 N.W.2d 824 (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). “In these consolidated appeals involving a certified question, a notice of related appeal (A14-0027), and a separate appeal (A14-0123), we consider whether Minn. Stat. § 504B.215 prohibits a landlord from billing tenants for fees in connection with a tenant’s utility bill;…”
Kutscheid v. Emerald Square Props., Inc., 770 N.W.2d 529 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). “* Appellant brought this rent-escrow action against respondents, alleging that respondents violated Minn.Stat. § 504B.215, subd. 2a(l), which requires notice to prospective tenants of the total utility cost for a single-metered residential apartment building for each month of…”
Hannah Hekel v. Hunter Warfield, Inc., 118 F.4th 938 (8th Cir. 2024). “See Minn. Stat. § 504B.215, subd. 2a (requiring notice for certain utility charges); see also 15 U.”
Jeff Persigehl & Samone Bodley, individually & on behalf of the putative classes, (A14-0027), (A14-0123) v. Ridgebrook Investments Ltd. P'ship, (A14-0027), (A14-0123), MNS Investors, LLP d/b/a Bar-Ett Inv. Co., (A14-0027), (A14-0123), Am. Util. Mgmt., Inc., (A14-0027), (A14-0123). (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). “OPINION HUDSON, Judge In these consolidated appeals involving a certified question, a notice of related appeal (A14-0027), and a separate appeal (A14-0123), we consider whether Minn. Stat. § 504B.215 prohibits a landlord from billing tenants for fees in connection with a…”
Northland Inv. Corp. v. Pub. Utils. Regulatory Auth., 349 Conn. 35 (Conn. 2024). “Minn. Stat. Ann. § 504B.215 (2a) (a) (3) and (b) (West 2023).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.