Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 518.171 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 2005 c 164 s 31; 2006 c 280 s 43]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases, 1987–2002 · leading case: Marriage of Korf v. Korf, 553 N.W.2d 706 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Marriage of Korf v. Korf, 553 N.W.2d 706 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 8× “”); Minn.Stat. § 518.171, subd. 10 (1994) (for the purpose of enforcement, the costs of individual or group health, dental coverage, all medical costs, including health and dental insurance premiums, ordered by the court but paid by obligee because of obligor’s failure to…”

Nolte v. Mehrens, 648 N.W.2d 727 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “But Minn.Stat. § 518.171, subd. 1(a) (2000), states that every support order “must * * * expressly assign or reserve” uninsured medical costs.”

Winona Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Casper, 593 N.W.2d 709 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 518.171, subd. 1(b) (1998). Here, the ALJ found that appellant received a net monthly income of $1,267.”

Johnson v. Hunter, 447 N.W.2d 871 (Minn. 1989). “§ 518.171, subd. 5); causes of action (id.”

Marriage of Novak v. Novak, 406 N.W.2d 64 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 518.171, subd. 1 (1986) provides: Unless the obligee has group dependent health insurance coverage available at a more reasonable cost, the court shall order the obligor to name the minor child as beneficiary on any health and dental insurance plan that is available…”

Marriage of Mueller v. Mueller, 419 N.W.2d 845 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 518.171 (1986) also requires findings to show that appellant's request does or does not give more coverage to the children for less cost.”

Case v. Case, 516 N.W.2d 570 (Minn. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 518.171, subd. 1(c) (Supp.1993).”

Marriage of Bruner v. Bruner, 429 N.W.2d 679 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “611; (5) ordering respondent to maintain medical, hospitalization and dental coverage for the children pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 518.171 ; (6) and other relief.”

Bock v. Bock, 506 N.W.2d 321 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 518.171, subd. 10. Appellant contends the trial court erred in omitting these notices from its order.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.