Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 518.617 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 518A.72]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2001–2001 · leading case: In Re Marriage of Crockarell, 631 N.W.2d 829 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Marriage of Crockarell, 631 N.W.2d 829 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 13× “Appellant also argued that, because there was no court-ordered payment plan under Minn.Stat. § 518.617 (2000), he cannot be held in contempt.”

Ramsey Cnty. v. Crockarell, 631 N.W.2d 829 (Minn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 12× “Appellant also argued that, because there was no court-ordered payment plan under Minn.Stat. § 518.617 (2000), he cannot be held in contempt.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.