Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 525. PROBATE PROCEEDINGS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 525.261 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1974 [Repealed, 1975 c 347 s 144]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1943–1984 · leading case: Sandstrom v. Wahlstrom, 89 N.W.2d 19 (Minn. 1958).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sandstrom v. Wahlstrom, 89 N.W.2d 19 (Minn. 1958). · cites it 3× “The trial court denied the petition to allow the will and held that the petitioner did not prove that decedent died leaving a will and also held that, if the decedent ever made a will, its provisions had not been proved clearly and distinctly in accordance with § 525.261. 1 In…”
Matter of Est. of Langlie, 355 N.W.2d 732 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 525.261, repealed by Minn. Laws 1975 ch.”
Firestone v. Greenberg, 82 N.W.2d 239 (Minn. 1957). · cites it 2× “1300, decided before § 525.261. Decisions from states such as New York, Arkansas, Washington, California, Ohio, Indiana, and Montana, with statutes requiring proof that will claimed to have been lost was in physical existence at time of testator’s death or had been fraudulently…”
Calich v. Consul of the Kingdom, 8 N.W.2d 337 (Minn. 1943). “” We hold that there is ample support in the evidence for the trial *304 court’s finding that this burden of establishing the existence of the purported lost will was not sustained.”
In Re Est. of Sandstrom, 252 Minn. 46 (Minn. 1958). · cites it 3× “The trial court denied the petition to allow the will and held that the petitioner did not prove that decedent died leaving a will and also held that, if the decedent ever made a will, its provisions had not been proved clearly and distinctly in accordance with § 525.261. [1] In…”
In Re Est. of Greenberg, 249 Minn. 254 (Minn. 1957). · cites it 2× “1300 , decided before § 525.261. Decisions from states such as New York, Arkansas, Washington, California, Ohio, Indiana, and Montana, with statutes requiring proof that will claimed to have been lost was in physical existence at time of testator's death or had been fraudulently…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.