Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 525.49 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1957 [Repealed, 1961 c 265 s 3]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1944–1993 · leading case: Haverstock v. Wolf, 491 F. Supp. 447 (D. Minnesota 1980).
Haverstock v. Wolf, 491 F. Supp. 447 (D. Minnesota 1980). “Wolf was compensated out of the proceeds of the estate pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 525.49 (1971). 1 David Warden was fully aware that at the time of the fee dispute in connection with the guardianship, R.”
In Re Est. of Bush, 230 N.W.2d 33 (Minn. 1975). “1971, § 525.49, and expenses. The relief sought was $500,000 by each executor (less amounts received), plus expenses of $5,011.”
In Re Est. of Healy, 247 Minn. 205 (Minn. 1956). “72, § 118, amended the prior statute to read as it now does in that portion of § 525.49 above set forth. It should be noted that under the 1935 laws the word "shall" was substituted for the word "may" and the test of good faith was specifically included.”
In Re Est. of Evenson, 505 N.W.2d 90 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “However, two of the cited cases rely on Minn.Stat. § 525.49, which was repealed in 1974.”
Distributors Supply Co. Inc. v. Est. of Shablow, 92 N.W.2d 83 (Minn. 1958). “While the propriety of these allowances may not be too important, it is doubtful if it can be considered the pursuit of a claim under § 525.49. Furthermore, if the case had been tried to completion, it is doubtful if the trial court would have disallowed these fees or at least…”
Hursh v. Theis, 76 N.W.2d 677 (Minn. 1956). “72, § 118, amended the prior statute to read as it now does in that portion of § 525.49 above set forth. It should be noted that under the 1935 laws the word “shall” was substituted for the word “may” and the test of good faith was specifically included.”
Pangalos v. Halpern, 76 N.W.2d 702 (Minn. 1956). “First, it is to be observed that an order made pursuant to § 525.49 directing, or refusing to direct, the payment of attorneys’ fees is appealable by either the representative or by the attorney.”
Spannaus v. Arrowood, 230 N.W.2d 33 (Minn. 1975). “1971, § 525.49, and expenses. The *113 relief sought was $500,000 by each executor (less amounts received), plus expenses of $5,011.”
In Re Est. of Baumgartner, 144 N.W.2d 574 (Minn. 1966). “eriod attorneys are often required to locate and preserve the assets of the estate; to investigate joint tenancy holdings; to determine the status of insurance policies; to ascertain various estate and inheritance tax situations which may arise; to look after rental of…”
Angelos v. Balafas, 225 N.W.2d 539 (Minn. 1975). “1971, § 525.49, applicable to these proceedings, 1 provides in part: *515 “Every representative shall be allowed his necessary expenses incurred in the execution of his trust and shall have such compensation for his services as the court shall deem just and reasonable.”
Langley v. Smith, 15 N.W.2d 16 (Minn. 1944). “1941, § 525.49 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 8992-118), which reads: “When any person named as executor in a will or codicil defends it or prosecutes any proceedings in good faith and with just cause, for the purpose of having it admitted to probate, whether successful or not, * * *…”
Spannaus ex rel. Bush Found. v. Arrowood, 250 N.W.2d 146 (Minn. 1976). “1971, § 525.49. See, *147 also, Minn.St.1971, § 525.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.