Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 525.58 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 2002 [Repealed, 2003 c 12 art 2 s 8]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1943–2003 · leading case: In Re Disciplinary Action Against Cutting, 671 N.W.2d 173 (Minn. 2003).
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Cutting, 671 N.W.2d 173 (Minn. 2003). “Pursuant to Minnesota Statute[s] § 525.58, respondent in his fiduciary capacities is obligated to annually file Annual Accounts, a Notice of Right to Petition (Notice) and other reports regarding the ward, conservatee or estate.”
In re Guardianship of D.M.S., 379 N.W.2d 605 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “See Minn.Stat. §§ 525.58, subd. 1 (1984) (filing of annual account), subd.”
In re Conservatorship/Guardianship of Robinson, 409 N.W.2d 269 (Minn. 1987). “We therefore will not address the procedure followed by the court, but we do note that Minn.Stat. § 525.58, subd. 1 (1986) states that examination and acceptance of the account shall not constitute an adjudication or determination of the merits of the account.”
In Re Conservatorship of Nelsen, 587 N.W.2d 649 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). “See Minn.Stat. § 525.58, subd. 2 (1998) (requiring annual notice to conserva-tee of right to petition for restoration of capacity or modification of conservatorship); Minn.”
In Re Est. of Staples, 8 N.W.2d 45 (Minn. 1943). “1941, § 525.58 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 8992-127), provides: *341 “Any property given by an intestate in Ms lifetime to a child or other lineal descendant when expressed in the gift or grant as an advancement or charged in writing by the intestate as such, or so acknowledged by…”
In Re the Guardianship of the Est. of Saliterman, 366 N.W.2d 681 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “” Minn. Stat. § 525.58 (1957). Unless otherwise ordered, the guardian was to be examined on the account, although a ward restored to capacity could show he settled with the guardian and petition for discharge without further hearing.”
Sargent v. Willyard, 53 N.W.2d 136 (Minn. 1952). “§ 525.58. Thus, even if the recitals of appointment in the judgments are accepted as stating the fact, it appears that James C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.