Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 525. PROBATE PROCEEDINGS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 525.72 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1978 [Repealed, 1980 c 344 s 2]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1943–1977 · leading case: Grier v. Est. of Grier, 89 N.W.2d 398 (Minn. 1958).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Grier v. Est. of Grier, 89 N.W.2d 398 (Minn. 1958). · cites it 6× “Section 525.72 provides in part that— “* * * after perfection of the appeal [from the probate court to the district court], the appellant shall file with the clerk of the district court, and serve upon the adverse party or his attorney a clear and concise statement of the…”
In Re Leary's Appeal, 136 N.W.2d 552 (Minn. 1965). · cites it 5× “Petitioner moves to dismiss the appeal here on the ground that appellant has failed to file in the district court a statement of propositions of law and fact upon which she relies, as required by § 525.”
In Re Psychopathic Personality of Dittrich, 9 N.W.2d 510 (Minn. 1943). “The finding in accord *238 anee with these views is supported by the evidence and is sustained.”
Gabel v. Ferodowill, 95 N.W.2d 101 (Minn. 1959). “711 provides for venue; and § 525.72 provides for trial after perfection of appeal as follows: “Within 20 days after perfection of the appeal, the appellant shall file with the clerk of the district court, and serve upon the adverse party or his attorney a clear and concise…”
Walker v. Leary, 136 N.W.2d 552 (Minn. 1965). · cites it 5× “Petitioner moves to dismiss the appeal here on the ground that appellant has failed to file in the district court a statement of propositions of law and fact upon which she relies, as required by § 525.”
In Re Est. of Hencke, 19 N.W.2d 718 (Minn. 1945). “” And since § 169 of the probate code (§ 525.72 [§ 8992-169]) provides that on appeal the cause shall be “tried, and determined in the same manner as if originally commenced in that court,” the district court erred in not going into and determining what § 115 of the code…”
Stevens v. Carlsen, 27 N.W.2d 872 (Minn. 1947). · cites it 3× “§ 525.72, he again failed to challenge the attestation of the will, and the principal controversy was over the question of whether or not the will was a forgery.”
McCarthy v. Percich, 211 N.W.2d 170 (Minn. 1973). · cites it 2× “Section 525.72, providing for de novo trials on appeal to the district court in probate matters, no longer has general application.”
Bowen v. McDaniel, 22 N.W.2d 8 (Minn. 1946). “§ 8992-166]); and (2) appellant was guilty of inexcusable neglect and laches in failing to file and serve within 20 days after perfecting the appeal, as required by § 525.72 (§ 8992-169), a statement of the propositions of law and fact upon which he would rely for a reversal of…”
State ex rel. Eagle v. Omodt, 250 N.W.2d 596 (Minn. 1977). · cites it 2× “1974, § 525.72. We concluded that § 487.39 superseded § 525.”
Kicker v. Rowe, 113 N.W.2d 352 (Minn. 1962). “§ 525.72. While the claim of a pretermitted child cannot be initiated in the district court without first invoking the jurisdiction of the probate court, 2 no prerequisite for perfecting an appeal to the district court is specified in our law beyond the necessity for a probate…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.