Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 525.79 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1965 [Repealed, 1967 c 638 s 22]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1944–1965 · leading case: In Re Leary's Appeal, 136 N.W.2d 552 (Minn. 1965).
In Re Leary's Appeal, 136 N.W.2d 552 (Minn. 1965). “Petitioner moves to dismiss the appeal here on the ground that appellant has failed to file in the district court a statement of propositions of law and fact upon which she relies, as required by § 525.”
State Ex Rel. Anderson v. United States Vets. Hosp., 128 N.W.2d 710 (Minn. 1964). “23 If an appeal had been taken from the order of commitment pursuant to § 525.79, 24 within the time fixed by § 525.”
Walker v. Leary, 136 N.W.2d 552 (Minn. 1965). “Petitioner moves to dismiss the appeal here on the ground that appellant has failed to file in the district court a statement of propositions of law and fact upon which she relies, as required by § 525.”
Teubner v. State, 216 Minn. 553 (Minn. 1944). “” Notwithstanding our somewhat critical analysis of the entire proceedings below, we would not disturb the result if the trial court had applied the correct rule as to quantum of proof in proceedings of this kind.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.