Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 549.211 (2026)

Sanctions In Civil Actions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Acknowledgment required.

The parties by their attorneys in a civil action shall attach to and make a part of the pleading, written motions, and papers served on the opposite party or parties a signed acknowledgment stating that the parties acknowledge that sanctions may be imposed under this section.

Subd. 2.Effect of acknowledgment.

By presenting to the court, whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating, a pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances:

(1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation;

(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law;

(3) the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and

(4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief.

Subd. 3.Sanctions may be imposed.

If, after notice and a reasonable opportunity to respond, the court determines that subdivision 2 has been violated, the court may, subject to the conditions in this section, impose an appropriate sanction upon the attorneys, law firms, or parties that have violated subdivision 2 or are responsible for the violation.

Subd. 4.How initiated.

(a) A motion for sanctions under this section must be made separately from other motions or requests and describe the specific conduct alleged to violate subdivision 2. It must be served as provided under the Rules of Civil Procedure, but may not be filed with or presented to the court unless, within 21 days after service of the motion, or another period as the court may prescribe, the challenged paper, claim, defense, contention, allegation, or denial is not withdrawn or appropriately corrected. If warranted, the court may award to the party prevailing on the motion the reasonable expenses and attorney fees incurred in presenting or opposing the motion. Absent exceptional circumstances, a law firm is jointly responsible for violations committed by its partners, associates, and employees.

(b) On its own initiative, the court may enter an order describing the specific conduct that appears to violate subdivision 2 and directing an attorney, law firm, or party to show cause why it has not violated subdivision 2 with respect to that conduct.

Subd. 5.Nature of sanction; limitations.

(a) A sanction imposed for violation of this section must be limited to what is sufficient to deter repetition of the conduct or comparable conduct by others similarly situated. Subject to the limitations in paragraph (b), the sanction may consist of, or include, directives of a nonmonetary nature, an order to pay a penalty into court, or, if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence, an order directing payment to the movant of some or all of the reasonable attorney fees and other expenses incurred as a direct result of the violation.

(b) Monetary sanctions may not be awarded against a represented party for a violation of subdivision 2, clause (2). Monetary sanctions may not be awarded on the court's initiative unless the court issues its order to show cause before a voluntary dismissal or settlement of the claims made by or against the party which is, or whose attorneys are, to be sanctioned.

(c) When imposing sanctions, the court shall describe the conduct determined to constitute a violation of this section and explain the basis for the sanction imposed.

Subd. 6.Application; effect on other sanctions.

(a) This section does not apply to disclosures and discovery requests, responses, objections, and motions that are subject to discovery provisions and remedies of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

(b) An order or award of sanctions under this section is without prejudice and an alternative to sanctions that may be asserted under the Rules of Civil Procedure.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 64 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1998–2025 · leading case: Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms, 719 N.W.2d 226 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms, 719 N.W.2d 226 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 22× “ct claim against respondent Jorgenson Farms, arguing that it was denied the opportunity to conduct necessary discovery, that genuine issues of material fact regarding the formation of a contract between the parties preclude summary judgment, and that the district court erred by…”

Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc., 672 N.W.2d 578 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 22× “He now appeals from the district court’s order awarding respondents Licking, Faltin, and Micke bad-faith attorney fees as sanctions under Minn. Stat. § 549.211 (2002). David Dyrdal (Dyrdal) sued respondent Golden Nuggets, Inc.”

In Re Rollins, 738 N.W.2d 798 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 26× “211, subd. 4(a), and rule 11 to argue that Rollins’s motion for sanctions was unsupported, made in bad faith, and that they should be awarded $4,732 in expenses and fees for defending against Rollins’s motion.”

Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. Johnson, 726 N.W.2d 516 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 22× “Appellant argues that the fee award constitutes an abuse of discretion because respondent did not adhere to the statutory “safe-harbor” requirements of Minn.Stat. § 549.211 (2004) and Minn. R: Civ.”

Whalen Ex Rel. Whalen v. Whalen, 594 N.W.2d 277 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 32× “04 do not apply to father's petitions under the Domestic Abuse Act; (2) denying mother's request for an evidentiary hearing; and (3) denying mother's claim for costs and attorney fees pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 549.211 (1998) and Minn. R. Civ.”

Lamere v. St. Jude Med., Inc., 827 N.W.2d 782 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 10× “And because we conclude that the appeal is meritorious, we deny respondent’s motion for sanctions pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 549.211 (2012). FACTS In February 1988, Thomas C.”

In Re the Claims for No-Fault Benefits Against Progressive Ins. Co., 720 N.W.2d 865 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 14× “11 and Minn.Stat. § 549.211 (2004). In an order dated August 8, 2005, the district court in the Pallares case confirmed the arbitration award and found no legal basis to stay the arbitration award pending the outcome of the federal lawsuit.”

Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc., 716 N.W.2d 634 (Minn. 2006). · cites it 4× “11; Minn.Stat. § 549.211 (2004). That different facts could present a case where a builder had no time to bring contribution and indemnity claims while the underlying damages claim goes forward is not mere speculation, but is born out by case law.”

Collins v. Waconia Dodge, Inc., 793 N.W.2d 142 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 10× “The district court also concluded that appellant’s pursuit of the action and refusal to dismiss his claims following a request to do so “requirefd] significant sanctions” under Minn.Stat. § 549.211 (2010) or Minn. R. Civ.”

Leonard v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 605 N.W.2d 425 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 8× “Minn.Stat. § 549.211 (1998). The decision of whether to award attorneys’ fees for frivolous claims rests within this court’s broad discretion.”

Kalenburg v. Klein, 847 N.W.2d 34 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 10× “Respondents filed a notice of related appeal, challenging the district court’s denial of their motions for *37 attorney fees and costs concerning a discovery dispute and sanctions under Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and Minnesota Statutes section 549.211, subdivision 3…”

Cole v. Star Tribune, 581 N.W.2d 364 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 8× “21 (1996) was repealed and replaced with Minn.Stat. § 549.211 (Supp.1997). Because Minn.”

Show all 64 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.