Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 554.05 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2022 [Repealed, 2024 c 123 art 18 s 16]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2010–2014 · leading case: Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota, 848 N.W.2d 224 (Minn. 2014).
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota, 848 N.W.2d 224 (Minn. 2014). · cites it 3× “See Minn.Stat. § 554.05 (“Nothing in this chapter limits or precludes any rights the moving party or responding party may have under any other constitutional, statutory, case, or common law, or rule.”
Middle-Snake-Tamarac Rivers Watershed Dist. v. Stengrim, 784 N.W.2d 834 (Minn. 2010). · cites it 2× “01-045 must be interpreted consistent with Minn. Stat. § 554.05 , which provides that nothing in the chapter “limits or precludes any rights the moving party or responding party may have under any other constitutional, statutory, case, or common law, or rule.”
Loren J. Zutz v. John Nelson (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). “§ 554.05 (“Nothing in this chapter limits or precludes any rights the moving party or responding party may have under any other constitutional, statutory, case, or common law, or rule.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.