Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 576.28 (2026)
Immunity; Discovery From Receiver
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The receiver shall be entitled to all defenses and immunities provided at common law for acts or omissions within the scope of the receiver's appointment.
(b) No person other than a successor receiver duly appointed by the court shall have a right of action against a receiver to recover receivership property or the value thereof.
(c) A party or party in interest may conduct discovery of the receiver concerning any matter relating to the receiver's administration of the receivership property after obtaining an order authorizing the discovery.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2026 · leading case: Wilmington Trust, Nat'l Ass'n, Gregg Williams v. 700 HENNEPIN HOLDINGS, LLC, ... (Minn. Ct. App. 2026).
Wilmington Trust, Nat'l Ass'n, Gregg Williams v. 700 HENNEPIN HOLDINGS, LLC, ... (Minn. Ct. App. 2026). “27 (2024) in the amount of $3 million and (b) remove language that Seven asserts granted the receiver absolute immunity from claims, beyond the scope of immunity allowed by Minnesota Statutes section 576.28(a) (2024). Section 576.27 provides, in part, “After appointment, a…”
In re: Receivership of United States Installment Realty Co.. (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). “See Minn. Stat. § 576.28 (a) (2014) (providing that a “receiver shall be entitled to all defenses and immunities provided at common law for acts or omissions within the scope of the receiver’s appointment”).”
— Minn. Stat. § 576.28(a) — 1 case
Wilmington Trust, Nat'l Ass'n, Gregg Williams v. 700 HENNEPIN HOLDINGS, LLC, ... (Minn. Ct. App. 2026). “27 (2024) in the amount of $3 million and (b) remove language that Seven asserts granted the receiver absolute immunity from claims, beyond the scope of immunity allowed by Minnesota Statutes section 576.28(a) (2024). Section 576.27 provides, in part, “After appointment, a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.