Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 585.04 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1974 c 394 s 11]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1950–1992 · leading case: Bellows v. Ericson, 46 N.W.2d 654 (Minn. 1951).
Bellows v. Ericson, 46 N.W.2d 654 (Minn. 1951). “” Although defendant has made no point of the fact and apparently the question was not raised or considered in the court below, it appears from the record before us that the order in question was issued without a bond being filed as required by § 585.04. Section 585.04 provides…”
Hubbard Broad., Inc. v. Loescher, 291 N.W.2d 216 (Minn. 1980). “Josephson was decided under Minn.Stat. § 585.04 (1971) (repealed 1974).”
Paradata of Minn. v. Fox, 356 N.W.2d 852 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “NOTES [1] Northwest Hotel was decided under Minn.Stat. § 585.04 (repealed 1974). Although Rule 65.”
Gram v. Vill. of Shoreview, 106 N.W.2d 553 (Minn. 1960). “§ 585.04. The provisions of this section are mandatory, 6 while it is discretionary under § 562.”
Petition of Giblin, 232 N.W.2d 214 (Minn. 1975). “04, a statute in effect when the district court granted respondent the temporary injunction, provided in pertinent part: "When not otherwise especially provided by law, the applicant for the writ, before *223 the same issues, shall give a bond in the penal sum of at least $250,…”
Nw. Hotel Corp. v. Henderson, 100 N.W.2d 493 (Minn. 1959). “04, which provides: “When not otherwise especially provided by law, the applicant for the writ, before the same issues, shall give a bond in the penal sum of at least $250, executed by him or some person for him as principal, approved by the court or judge, conditioned for the…”
Lamb v. Hamblin, 57 F.R.D. 58 (D. Minn. 1972). “§ 585.04 requires posting of a minimum $250.”
Bennett v. Johnson, 42 N.W.2d 44 (Minn. 1950). “05, relating to the requirements for a bond on the part of an assignee for the benefit of creditors in at least double the value of the estate assigned, as shown by the inventory, with § 585.04, requiring a bond before issuance of an injunction or restraining order.”
Vill. of Elbow Lake v. Otter Tail Power Co., 160 N.W.2d 571 (Minn. 1968). “It is clearly more narrow in scope than § 585.04. Whatever other elements of damage are provable as a result of delays experienced in litigation of this kind, attorney’s fees for trying the main action is not one of them.”
Bio-Line, Inc. v. Wilfley, 366 N.W.2d 662 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Minn.Stat. § 585.04 (1972), repealed 1974 Minn.”
Craigmile v. Sorenson, 62 N.W.2d 846 (Minn. 1954). “Defendants, who are the relators here, contend that the writ should be made absolute because: (1) The bond in the sum of fl,500 given by plaintiffs when the temporary injunction was issued was not in compliance with § 585.04 and, hence, renders the temporary injunction null and…”
Pike v. Gunyou, 488 N.W.2d 298 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). “In fact, the supreme court in Gram specifically noted that the potentially "onerous" implications of a bond requirement under Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.