Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 588. CONTEMPTS OF COURT
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 588.09 (2026)

Hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When the person arrested has been brought into court, or has appeared, the court or officer shall investigate the charge by examining the person and the witnesses for and against the person, for which an adjournment may be had from time to time, if necessary.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1957–2024 · leading case: State v. Tayari-Garrett, 841 N.W.2d 644 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Tayari-Garrett, 841 N.W.2d 644 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “” See Minn.Stat. § 588.09 (2012). To conduct a proper examination of appellant, the district court ordered her to appear in person at the May 9 hearing.”
Wenzel v. Mathies, 542 N.W.2d 634 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Three grounds for attachment apply: (1) when a party did or is about to transfer or dispose of its property with the intent to delay or defraud its creditors; (2) when a party removed or is about to remove property from this state to delay or defraud creditors; and (3) when a…”
Clausen v. Clausen, 84 N.W.2d 675 (Minn. 1957). · cites it 4× “04, when read with §§ 588.09, 588.10, and 588.14, clearly requires that the accused must appear personally before the court may have him placed in jail.”
Finch v. Marusich, 457 N.W.2d 767 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 588.09 (1988); Mahady v. Mahady, 448 N.”
State v. Tatum, 556 N.W.2d 541 (Minn. 1996). “§ 588.09. This and other sections preceding section 588.”
In re Braun, 502 N.W.2d 219 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 588.09 (1992); see also Clausen v.”
John P. Norusis v. City of Marine on Saint Croix (Minn. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 6× “Norusis relies on Minn. Stat. § 588.09 (2022) to support his argument.”
Lynne A. Torgerson v. State of Minnesota (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 588.09 (2010); In re Welfare of A.”
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel Goemaat (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “02; see Minn. Stat. § 588.09 (2014) (providing that, at a contempt hearing, the district court “shall investigate the charge by examining the person and the witnesses for and against the person”).”
In Re the Welfare of K.E.H., 542 N.W.2d 658 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “We conclude that the charge describes a constructive civil contempt, and we remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the requirements of Minn. Stat. §§ 588.09 and 588.10. We affirm the trial court’s stay of the juvenile disposition.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.