Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 589. HABEAS CORPUS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 589.29 (2026)

Appeals

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A party aggrieved by the final order in proceedings upon a writ of habeas corpus may appeal to the court of appeals as in other civil cases, except that no bond is required of the appellant. Upon filing notice of appeal with the court administrator of the district court, and payment of filing fees, the court administrator shall make, certify, and return to the clerk of the appellate courts copies of the petition, writ, return of respondent, answer, if any, of the relator, and the order appealed from.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1945–1990 · leading case: Case v. Pung, 413 N.W.2d 261 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Case v. Pung, 413 N.W.2d 261 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “As to his claim that the transfer from Stillwater to Oak Park Heights violated his fourteenth amendment liberty interests, it noted that appellant had filed a petition on this issue previously, and that the court had issued a final order, from which appellant could appeal…”
Kipp v. Saetre, 454 N.W.2d 639 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 589.29 (1988). Kipp decided to forego these remedies, and confine himself and his attorney to seeking the revocation hearing the judge had believed unnecessary.”
State Ex Rel. Dufault v. Utecht, 19 N.W.2d 706 (Minn. 1945). “1941, § 589.29 (Mason St. 1927, § 9767), provides for appeals in habeas corpus proceedings as follows: “Any party aggrieved by the final order in proceedings upon a writ of habeas corpus may appeal therefrom to the supreme court in the same manner as other appeals are taken from…”
State Ex Rel. Alexander v. Rigg, 76 N.W.2d 478 (Minn. 1956). · cites it 2× “It can readily be seen that this view is prejudicial to no one in that § 589.29 gives a petitioner the right to appeal to this court from a disposition of the district court made on petition.”
Madison v. Tahash, 249 F. Supp. 600 (D. Minn. 1966). “Minnesota Statutes § 589.29 provides that appeals from final orders in habeas corpus proceedings must be taken in the same manner as other appeals.”
State Ex Rel. Farrington v. Rigg, 78 N.W.2d 721 (Minn. 1956). “In order to remove this case from the District Court of Washington County to the Supreme Court on appeal, procedural steps must be taken as are taken in civil actions, except for the bond, and compliance with §§ 589.29, 605.03, and 632.02 must be shown since the right of appeal…”
State Ex Rel. Campbell v. Tahash, 112 N.W.2d 37 (Minn. 1961). “03 as required by § 589.29. Without ruling on this motion, we will consider the question whether the second petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleges facts which required the court considering the same to order that a writ of habeas corpus should issue.”
Bolstad v. State, 435 N.W.2d 547 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “” Minn.Stat. § 589.29 (1988) (emphasis added).”
State Ex Rel. Petschen v. Rigg, 99 N.W.2d 699 (Minn. 1959). · cites it 2× “Section 589.29 provides that any aggrieved party may appeal to this court from a final order in habeas corpus proceedings in the same manner as other appeals are taken from the district court but that no bond shall be required of the appellant.”
State Ex Rel. Dillard v. Tahash, 121 N.W.2d 602 (Minn. 1963). “(2d) 762, 763 , we called attention to the provisions of the statutes by which habeas corpus is appealed from in the district court under §§ 589.29 and 589.30, and pointed out that: “* * * the findings of the court below are entitled to the same weight as in any other case and…”
State v. Collins, 109 N.W.2d 327 (Minn. 1961). “” We made it clear in the Farrington case that on appeal in habeas corpus proceedings the same procedural steps must be taken as in other civil actions, except that no bond is required of appellant, and compliance with §§ 589.29, 605.03, and 632.02 must be shown since the right…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.