Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 610.39 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1949–1966 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Ahern v. Young, 141 N.W.2d 15 (Minn. 1966).
State Ex Rel. Ahern v. Young, 141 N.W.2d 15 (Minn. 1966). “1961, § 610.39, which provided, perhaps more clearly, that upon revocation of the order staying sentence, “the sentence theretofore imposed shall be executed in all respects as though no proceedings [with respect to probation] * * * had been taken.”
State v. Meyer, 37 N.W.2d 3 (Minn. 1949). “See, § 610.39. Neither is there any constitutional right to assistance of counsel after the completion of the trial and such appeal therefrom as may be provided by law.”
Breeding v. Swenson, 60 N.W.2d 4 (Minn. 1953). “Subsequently the court, as authorized by § 610.39, *98 revoked the stay of execution.”
State v. Mertz, 130 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. 1964). “1961, § 610.39). It has been pointed out by Federal authorities, Pernatto v.”
Breeding v. Swenson, 62 N.W.2d 488 (Minn. 1954). “Subsequently the court, as authorized by § 610.39, revoked the stay of execution of the sentence with the result that the original sentence was reinstated.”
State Ex Rel. Naus v. Rigg, 84 N.W.2d 698 (Minn. 1957). “§ 610.39. And in Breeding v. Swenson, supra, this court held that the trial court without notice and in its discretion could vacate a suspended sentence and reinstate the original sentence.”
State Ex Rel. Morris v. Tahash, 115 N.W.2d 676 (Minn. 1962). “§ 610.39; Jenks v. Municipal Court, supra; State v.”
State Ex Rel. Alm v. Tahash, 111 N.W.2d 458 (Minn. 1961). “2 Upon a careful scrutiny of the entire record we have no difficulty in holding that the court had jurisdiction over relator and of the offense for which he was convicted, that the sentence was authorized by law, and that relator was not denied any fundamental constitutional…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.