Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 613.04 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1950–1962 · leading case: State v. Gensmer, 51 N.W.2d 680 (Minn. 1951).
State v. Gensmer, 51 N.W.2d 680 (Minn. 1951). “" (e) In referring near the close of the charge to the nature of the crime as being that of asking for a bribe, and not giving the definition as found in the statute.”
State v. Nolan, 44 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 1950). “” The question certified to us by the trial court reads as follows: “Does the Constitution of the United States, the Constitution of the State of Minnesota, Section 613.04, R. S. 1945, or Section 610.”
State v. Soward, 114 N.W.2d 276 (Minn. 1962). “The defendant next contends that by the information he was charged with bribery under § 613.04 while the state’s case established an attempt or offer to bribe.”
State v. Lowrie, 49 N.W.2d 631 (Minn. 1951). “(2d) 66 , this court was asked to determine whether § 613.04 and § 610.47 granted immunity to a defendant from prosecution for his perjury accomplished in conjunction with his testimony under compulsion and over objection, before the public examiner under authority granted the…”
State Ex Rel. Soward v. Rigg, 97 N.W.2d 468 (Minn. 1959). “§ 613.04. Relator was given an indeterminate sentence on March 8, 1956, which operates as a sentence for the maximum term prescribed for the offense committed, i.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.