It is unlawful for any person knowingly to exhibit for a monetary consideration to a minor or knowingly to sell to a minor an admission ticket or pass or knowingly to admit a minor, whether or not for a monetary consideration, to a place of public accommodation where there is exhibited a motion picture, show or other presentation or a play, dance, or other exhibition presented before an audience which, in whole or in part, depicts nudity, sexual conduct, or sadomasochistic abuse and which is harmful to minors.
Notes of Decisions
Reno v. Am. Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997).
· cites it 2× “141 (1991) (no minors without an adult in places where alcohol is sold); Minn. Stat. § 617.294 (1987 and Supp. 1997) (no minors in places displaying movies or shows that are "harmful to minors"); Miss.”
Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, 531 F. Supp. 1162 (D. Minn. 1982).
· cites it 4× “Finally, he testified that exhibiting both general release and adult films created a significant risk of violation of Minn.Stat. § 617.294. 8 Another option for plaintiffs to remain in business is relocating to a site permitted under § 540.”
City of St. Paul v. Carlone, 419 N.W.2d 129 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988).
· cites it 7× “” Carlone’s argument may have had some merit prior to the amendment of Minn.Stat. § 617.294 (Supp.1987). Effective August 1, 1987, Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.