Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 619.42 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1947–1970 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Boswell v. Tahash, 154 N.W.2d 813 (Minn. 1967).
State Ex Rel. Boswell v. Tahash, 154 N.W.2d 813 (Minn. 1967). “Section 619.42 provided: “Every such unlawful taking, if accompanied by force or fear, in any case specified in section 619.”
State v. Jones, 127 N.W.2d 153 (Minn. 1964). “” *423 § 619.42. “Every such unlawful taking, if accompanied by force or fear, in any case specified in section 619.”
Willoughby v. Utecht, 27 N.W.2d 779 (Minn. 1947). “The crime of armed robbery to which petitioner pleaded guilty in Ohio would have constituted the felony of robbery in the first degree if committed in this state. On July 15, 1943, petitioner pleaded guilty to the crime of grand larceny in the second degree.”
Shaw v. Utecht, 43 N.W.2d 781 (Minn. 1950). “” Here, petitioner has served only about 18 years and 10 months of the sentence imposed under the indeterminate sentence law, which is far less than the maximum prescribed by § 619.”
State Ex Rel. Holm v. Tahash, 139 N.W.2d 161 (Minn. 1965). “It follows that petitioner is entitled to a hearing and determination of his claim, and the proceeding is remanded for that purpose.”
State Ex Rel. Dinneen v. Tahash, 136 N.W.2d 847 (Minn. 1965). “1953, § 619.42, then in effect, is not less than 5 nor more than 40 years.”
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Rigg, 96 N.W.2d 252 (Minn. 1959). “41 contains the definition of robbery; § 619.42 provides what constitutes robbery in the first degree; § 619.”
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Tahash, 136 N.W.2d 617 (Minn. 1965). “” Section 619.42 provided: “Every such unlawful taking, if accompanied by force or fear, in any case specified in section 619.”
State Ex Rel. Jones v. Tahash, 149 N.W.2d 270 (Minn. 1967). “1961, § 619.42. The information jointly charged relator and his wife with having robbed Leland Penrod and Herman Penrod on July 17, 1962, and having taken from them at the point of a Winchester rifle $77 in cash and a four-door Impala Chevrolet automobile.”
State v. Daml, 162 N.W.2d 240 (Minn. 1968). “1961, § 619.42. Defendant contends that the court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the effect of a witness’ prior inconsistent statement and that the verdict is not supported by the record.”
State Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Tahash, 122 N.W.2d 165 (Minn. 1963). “” 6 §§ 619.42 to 619.44. 7 North Dakota Code, § 12-40-03.”
State Ex Rel. Gerberding v. Tahash, 146 N.W.2d 541 (Minn. 1966). “16, (superseded by Minn. St. 609.03) prescribed a punishment of not more than 7 years’ imprisonment for felonies for which punishment was not prescribed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.