Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 632. APPEAL; FIRST-DEGREE MURDER
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 632.11 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1979 c 233 s 42]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases, 1968–2009 · leading case: State v. Underdahl, 767 N.W.2d 677 (Minn. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Underdahl, 767 N.W.2d 677 (Minn. 2009). · cites it 8× “The prosecution was required to meet our previous standard set forth in Minn.Stat. § 632.11 (1974), which required the prosecutor to show that the order "`effectively prevented the chance of a successful prosecution.”
State v. Aarsvold, 376 N.W.2d 518 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 14× “1, provides: The prosecuting attorney may appeal as of right to the Court of Appeals: (1) in any case, from any pretrial order of the trial court except an order dismissing a complaint for lack of probable cause to believe the defendant has committed an offense * * *. The…”
State v. Joon Kyu Kim, 398 N.W.2d 544 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 6× “12 (1967), required that an appeal by the state of a suppression order be accompanied by a statement: asserting that the deprivation of the use of * * * a confession or admission ordered to be suppressed has rendered the proof available to the state with respect to the criminal…”
State v. Rambahal, 751 N.W.2d 84 (Minn. 2008). · cites it 4× “"In Minnesota, the legislature first departed from this longstanding rule in 1967 when it enacted Minn.Stat. § 632.11 (1967) authorizing state appeal of certain pretrial orders.”
State v. Barrett, 694 N.W.2d 783 (Minn. 2005). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 632.11(3) (1967); Minn. R.Crim.”
State v. Miller, 391 N.W.2d 151 (N.D. 1986). · cites it 4× “] Minn.Stat. § 632.11 subd. 1(3) (1967). 4 See State v.”
State v. Wingo, 266 N.W.2d 508 (Minn. 1978). · cites it 2× “Rule 28 and Rule 29 permit the prosecutor to appeal any adverse pretrial order, as opposed to the limitations of § 632.11. It is apparent from the above discussion that the rules have enlarged the district court's appellate jurisdiction.”
City of St. Paul v. Hurd, 216 N.W.2d 259 (Minn. 1974). · cites it 4× “” 1 Defendant contends that while § 632.11, subd. 1, expressly authorizes appeals by the state in certain instances, it makes no mention of appeals by municipalities.”
State v. Cain, 427 N.W.2d 5 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 632.11 (1974) (repealed). The rules now make all pretrial orders, except dismissals for lack of probable cause, ap- *10 pealable by the state.”
State v. Abraham, 335 N.W.2d 745 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “On the other hand, if the trial court decides the issue in the defendant’s favor, that is the same as a finding of not guilty and therefore ends the matter, causing the prosecution to be terminated and further prosecution barred. Thus, although the state’s appeal in the instant…”
State v. Beckman, 209 N.W.2d 402 (Minn. 1973). · cites it 4× “In 1967, when §§ 632.11, 632.12, and 632.13 were enacted, 1 the legislature by § 632.”
State v. Carlson, 161 N.W.2d 38 (Minn. 1968). · cites it 3× “1 Section 632.11, subd. 1(3) (Ex. Sess. L. 1967, c.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
— Minn. Stat. § 632.11(3) — 1 case
State v. Barrett, 694 N.W.2d 783 (Minn. 2005). “Minn.Stat. § 632.11(3) (1967); Minn. R.Crim.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.