Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 634. EVIDENCE; WITNESSES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 634.08 (2026)

Exemptions; Arrest, Service Of Process

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If a person comes into this state in obedience to a court order directing the person's attendance and testimony in a criminal action or grand jury investigation in this state the person shall not, while in this state, pursuant to such court order, be subject to arrest or the service of process, civil or criminal, in connection with matters which arose before entrance into this state under such order.

If a person passes through this state while going to another state in obedience to a court order requiring the person's attendance and testimony in a criminal action or grand jury investigation in that state or while returning therefrom, the person shall not, while so passing through this state, be subject to arrest or the service of process, civil or criminal, in connection with matters which arose before entrance into this state pursuant to such court order.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2011–2014 · leading case: State v. Heiges, 806 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Heiges, 806 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2011). · cites it 4× “The first issue Heiges raises is whether a defendant’s inculpatory, postoffense, pre-investigation statement acknowledging guilt to a friend satisfies the requirements for a “confession” sufficient to warrant conviction under Minn.Stat. § 634.08 (2010) (providing that a…”
State v. Ayala-Leyva, 848 N.W.2d 546 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “Arrest of defense witness Appellant argues that the prosecutor interfered with his ability to call one of his co-conspirators, Rene Tirado, who was seized by law enforcement when he appeared at trial pursuant to a defense subpoena, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 634.08 (2012)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.