Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 65B. AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 65B.41 (2026)

Citation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 65B.41 to 65B.71 may be cited as the "Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 131 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Auto Owners Ins. Co. v. Perry, 749 N.W.2d 324 (Minn. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Auto Owners Ins. Co. v. Perry, 749 N.W.2d 324 (Minn. 2008). · cites it 12× “The Act sets forth the following definition of "dependent": For the purposes of definition under section 65B.41 to 65B.71, the following described persons shall be presumed to be dependents of a deceased person: (a) a wife is dependent on a husband with whom she lives at the…”
Mickelson v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 329 N.W.2d 814 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 18× “5, provides in pertinent part: "Insured" means an insured under a plan of reparation security as provided by sections 65B.41 to 65B.71, including the named insured and the following persons not identified by name as an insured while (a) residing in the same household with the…”
Burgraff v. Aetna Life & Cas. Co., 346 N.W.2d 627 (Minn. 1984). · cites it 14× “Mary Jo Burgraff, a relative of the named insured, resided in the same household as the named insured, owned a private passenger automobile, and was identified by name in another contract for a plan of reparation security complying with Minn. Stat. §§ 65B.41 to 65B.71 (1982) as…”
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss, 872 N.W.2d 524 (Minn. 2015). · cites it 6× “” Minn. Stat. § 65B.41. Thus, it is for the Legislature to address the complications and problems that will flow from the statutory language that the Legislature adopted.”
Wasche v. Milbank Mut. Ins. Co., 268 N.W.2d 913 (Minn. 1978). · cites it 5× “Both appeals raise these issues of first impression: (1) Whether stacking of two or more policy obligations to pay no-fault basic economic loss benefits is precluded under § 65B.41 et seq., and (2) what effect should be given to provisions of insurance policies purporting to…”
Gen. Cas. Co. of Wisconsin v. Concepts, 667 N.W.2d 441 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 5× “43 (2002), certain words and phrases are defined by statute for the purposes of Minn.Stat. §§ 65B.41 to 65B.71 (2002). Thus, an “insured” is defined by statute as “an insured under a plan of reparation security as provided by sections 65B.”
W. Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co. v. State Farm Ins. Co., 374 N.W.2d 441 (Minn. 1985). · cites it 6× “49 provides that subdivision 1 is "subject to the provisions of section 65B.41 to 65B.71." One of those latter provisions is Minn.”
Gudvangen v. Austin Mut. Ins. Co., 284 N.W.2d 813 (Minn. 1979). · cites it 4× “4(3) to read as follows: "`Uninsured motor vehicle' means any motor vehicle or motorcycle for which a plan of reparation security meeting the requirements of Sections 65B.41 to 65B.71 is not in effect.”
Am. Motorist Ins. Co. v. Sarvela, 327 N.W.2d 77 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 3× “This case involves a dispute over insurance coverage under the Minnesota No-Fault Insurance Act, Minn.Stat. § 65B.41, et seq. (1980). The stipulated facts disclose that Vicky M.”
W. Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co. v. State Farm Ins., 353 N.W.2d 169 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 6× “Notwithstanding any contrary provision in it, every contract of liability insurance for injury, wherever issued, covering obligations arising from ownership, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle, except a contract which provides coverage only for liability in excess of…”
Bartel v. New Haven Twp., 323 N.W.2d 806 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 4× “The offset provision applies only when all three requirements of the statute are satisfied: (a) a negligence action, (b) accruing as a result of injury arising out of the operation, ownership, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle, (c) with respect to which security has been…”
Pederson v. All Nation Ins. Co., 294 N.W.2d 693 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 4× “These appeals in an action brought by plaintiff to recover basic economic loss benefits and interest thereon pursuant to provisions of the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 65B.41 to 65B.71 (1978), raise the issues of which of two automobile insurers is…”
Show all 131 citing cases →
— Minn. Stat. § 65B.41(1) — 1 case
Reagan West v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co. (Minn. Ct. App. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.