Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 65B. AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 65B.67 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1992 c 571 art 14 s 14]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1974–1998 · leading case: Rosenberger v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 309 N.W.2d 305 (Minn. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rosenberger v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 309 N.W.2d 305 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 4× “1 (1980), requiring every owner of a motor vehicle to obtain insurance, a criminal violation under Minn.Stat. § 65B.67, subd. 2 (1980). Because of this criminal act, American Family argues that Rosenberger should be barred from collecting benefits under its policy.”
McClain v. Begley, 465 N.W.2d 680 (Minn. 1991). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 65B.67. Policy limits measure the amount of protection afforded the insured.”
Milbank Mut. Ins. Co. v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 332 N.W.2d 160 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 65B.67, subd. 2 (1982). This legislative history clearly indicates that the public policy of this state favors protection of the uncompensated victims of automobile accidents over any interest of an owner-insured or his insurer that he be not subject to liability…”
Mickelson v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 329 N.W.2d 814 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “§ 65B.67. In addition, such an injured owner is expressly prohibited from recovering basic economic loss benefits through the assigned claims plan.”
Iverson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 295 N.W.2d 573 (Minn. 1980). “§ 65B.67. In addition, such an injured owner is expressly prohibited from recovering basic economic loss benefits through the assigned claims plan.”
State Farm Ins. Companies v. Galajda, 316 N.W.2d 564 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 2× “) Under Minn.Stat. § 65B.67, subd. 1 (1980), it is made clear that “[ejvery owner of a motor vehicle or motorcycle for which security has not been provided as required by section 65B.”
Pierce v. State, 304 N.W.2d 332 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 18× “Minn. Stat. § 65B.67(2), (3) (1980). Using the misdemeanor provisions of the No-Fault Act and the suspension power granted by section 171.”
Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vanman, 453 N.W.2d 48 (Minn. 1990). “Minnesota Statute § 65B.67, subdivision 1 (1988), provides that the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act does not relieve the owner of an uninsured motor vehicle'of tort liability arising out of the operation, ownership, maintenance or use of the motor vehicle.”
State v. Mayard, 573 N.W.2d 707 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Fairchild was decided under a previous version of the statute and involved a question of burden of proof for the offense of operating a motor vehicle without insurance, then codified at Minn.Stat. § 65B.67, subd. 2 (1988). The Fairchild court, in reversing appellant’s…”
Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Vanman, 442 N.W.2d 351 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 4× “I respectfully dissent and would affirm the trial court’s conclusion that denying American Family’s common-law cause of action for subrogation or indemnity has the effect of excusing the uninsured tortfeasor from liability for his negligence, contrary to Minn.Stat. § 65B.67. The…”
State v. Fairchild, 444 N.W.2d 572 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 8× “The criminal provision under which Fairchild was convicted and sentenced is contained in Minn.Stat. § 65B.67. It provides in relevant part: Any owner of a motor vehicle or motorcycle with respect to which security is required under sections 65B.”
City of Fergus Falls v. Sporre, 300 N.W.2d 791 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “Defendant was originally charged with driving an uninsured vehicle, Minn.Stat. § 65B.67, subd. 3 (1978), and leaving the scene of an accident, Minn.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
— Minn. Stat. § 65B.67(2) — 1 case
Pierce v. State, 304 N.W.2d 332 (Minn. 1981). “Minn. Stat. § 65B.67(2), (3) (1980). Using the misdemeanor provisions of the No-Fault Act and the suspension power granted by section 171.”
— Minn. Stat. § 65B.67(4a) — 1 case
Pierce v. State, 304 N.W.2d 332 (Minn. 1981). “Minn. Stat. § 65B.67(2), (3) (1980). Using the misdemeanor provisions of the No-Fault Act and the suspension power granted by section 171.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.