Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 7. STATE TREASURER
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 7.12 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 16A.016]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1991–2024 · leading case: State v. McKown, 475 N.W.2d 63 (Minn. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. McKown, 475 N.W.2d 63 (Minn. 1991). · cites it 2× “Scott § 7.12(a) at 281-82 n. 28: [I]t is no interference with one's freedom of religion to convict of manslaughter one who, for religious reasons, fails to call a doctor when to fail to do so constitutes criminal negligence.”
Coyne's & Co., Inc. v. ENESCO, LLC, 565 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (D. Minn. 2008). “(Distributor Agreement § 7.12.) Coyne’s has not pled that CA has consented to Coyne’s infringement claim.”
SYT Solutions, LLC v. Burger, No. 0:20-cv-00794 (D. Minn. Jan. 12, 2021). · cites it 3× “) Section 7.12 of the Agreement states: Seller has not withheld any material facts relating to the Assets from the Purchasers.”
Karen Painter, PhD. v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of Minnesota, No. a230991 (Minn. Ct. App. Apr. 1, 2024). · cites it 2× “The procedures provided that the university’s academic units must, in compliance with section 7.12 of the Faculty Tenure policy, “have a document specifying the indices and criteria that will be used to evaluate candidates, and those criteria will apply to all candidates for…”
Ploen v. AIG Specialty Ins. Co., No. 0:21-cv-02248 (D. Minn. Dec. 10, 2024). “P39 § 7.12; Ex. P83 at 37–38; TT 197–198. If AOM fell out of compliance with any of the covenants, AOM’s lenders would have the right to accelerate the repayment of their loans.”
Minn. Stat. § 7.12(a): 1 case
State v. McKown, 475 N.W.2d 63 (Minn. 1991). “Scott § 7.12(a) at 281-82 n. 28: [I]t is no interference with one's freedom of religion to convict of manslaughter one who, for religious reasons, fails to call a doctor when to fail to do so constitutes criminal negligence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.